Laserfiche WebLink
<br />130 <br /> <br />130 <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER:. In other words, you favor the' idea, . subject to an <br />adjustment of acreage. Mr. McClure, what would be your. re~action? <br />MR. McCLUrtE: I have put the car:>tionon that sheet tentatively <br />as "Arizona and California." I respond favorably. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />lfJR. HOOVER: Would you go further and respond to it on a basis <br />of further.adjustment of tho acreage? <br />MR. McCLURE: I would not atth~s time say "no;" <br />MR. HOOVER: Mr;. Caldwell, is thore any possibility of arriving <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />at any plan subjoct to the adjustment of the acreage? <br /> <br />lfJR. CLAD\~1L: I do not look with favor on that at this time~ <br /> <br />Possibly I may come to it. I think I have made myself clear be- <br /> <br />fore on the matter. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: If we vlere able to' expand the acreage? <br /> <br />MR.CALD\,IELLI I am opposed to the whole acreage idea, because <br /> <br />I believe it is a harder proposition than it would be to adhere to <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />the vlater idea. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: Mr. Carpenter, wo1.1ld there be any hope of agreeing <br /> <br />on this line subject to an adjustmerit of acreage? <br /> <br />MR. CARPENTER: I have my seriqusdoubts of out legislature <br />looking with favor upon an acreage ~imitati6n. Personally, I might <br />, <br />I .. . <br />entertain more liberal viows in tha~ respect than others in my <br />I <br />State might. If it be true, however, that ~Ie should finally agree <br />upon that, then'the acreage here sp$cificd must bo amplified, be~ <br />cause there are two factors left out of these figures (Cites as <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.' <br />one example the City of Donver,) The entire wator supply for the <br /> <br />W. <br />