Laserfiche WebLink
<br />128 <br /> <br />128 <br /> <br />\.Jyoming <br />Colorado <br />Utah <br />Ilew J.vlexico <br />ilevada <br />Arizona <br />California <br /> <br />543,000 acres <br />1,018,000 II . <br />456,000 11 <br />483,000 n <br />82,000 " <br />676,000 ". <br />481,000 " <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Provided that adequate storage be created at one of the major <br /> <br />dam sites in the Grand Canyon - <br /> <br />Provided also that a permanent commission shall be created, <br /> <br />which shall, whenever it be sho;m to the satisfaction of said com- <br /> <br />mission that there are lands within.any state, in addition to the <br /> <br />areas hereinabove, stated, that may pe.irrigated from the waters. <br /> <br /> <br />. of the Colorado River without detriment to the.proper. irrigation <br /> <br />of other areas hereinabove stated for each state, have power to <br /> <br />grant to such'state the use .of waters of said river for such ad- <br /> <br />ditional acreage, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />J.vlR.DAVIS l I would 'like to haVe it distinctly understood that <br /> <br />the paper I prepared and subrnitted is not a proposition. It sim- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ply represented an idea that was then in my mind and I am not in <br /> <br />the least coriunitted to it and I would like tornodify it in one or <br /> <br />t;TO respects. <br />MR. HOOVER: Mr. Norviel's ide~ here involves a limitation of <br /> <br />acreage on some basis; as I assume he does not rigidly adhere to <br /> <br />the acreage mentioned. It then becomes a question of a sort of <br /> <br /> <br />defer~eddetermination of the allocation of the water above a cer- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />tain maximum upon a basis of actual priority of development.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />vI, <br />