My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03626
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:19 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/30/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #7
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />123 <br />. MR.' HOOVER: Mr. Emerson, what ,iOuld your vim,rs be on this pro- <br />posal? <br />MR. EMERSON: ,fuy, it would be agreeable to me, as an Upper <br />State, provided the lower States could subscribe .to it, but I hope <br />to see" plan evolve that all seven States, can subscribe to. <br />!/JR. HOOVER: Mr. Scrugham? <br />MR. SCRUGIJAN: The fundamental objection is that projects on <br />the lower river can not be successfully financed unless Mr. Car- <br />penter's proposal is materially modified. If this' COllUliission fails <br />to come to an understanding, it will be a serious reflection upon <br />the personnel of our organization. It "rill mean the holding up <br />of construction work and serieus delay in the financing of future <br />projects. Unless Mr. Carpenter can modify his statements, Ida <br /> <br /> <br />. not believe that this Commission can come to any agreement. <br /> <br /> <br />MR. CALDWELL; I do not quite take tho view of Colonel Scrog- <br /> <br /> <br />ham. I believe that if Hr. Carpenter's 'idea prevails, as I under- <br /> <br /> <br />stand it, it '1rould still be possible to finance the Boulder Can- <br /> <br /> <br />yon Dam and the other developments on the river, as is evidenced <br /> <br /> <br />by the statement that is being submitted py private interests and <br /> <br /> <br />as evidenced by statement of Director Davis to "rhich I can refer. <br /> <br /> <br />I feel that Director Davis is willing, notwithstanding the view- <br /> <br /> <br />point of Mr. Carpenter, to recommend that the Government build a <br /> <br /> <br />Boulder Canyon Dam, so He have a case of private interests and <br /> <br /> <br />Government interests, each of them willing to go into the devel-.. <br /> <br /> <br />opment of the Colorado River. Personally, I do not think that <br /> <br /> <br />tho attitude would be a bar to the development of the Colorado <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. <br />.. <br /> <br />River. <br /> <br />vi. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.