Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3 <br /> <br />~ fragments. Some judgment must be exercised in establishing the <br />~ salt content of a soil that is actively becoming sediment because <br />~~ large limestone or lime rich sedimentary rock fragments may not <br />completely break down in transport to yield the full percentage <br />of salt content. <br /> <br />The salt content of a soil can be obtained by direct sampling and <br />chemical analysis ina laboratory or by estimating the salt <br />content from previous published analyses of comparable soils. .,It <br />should be noted that SCS soil survey reports contain some s.oil <br />salt data. This data often refers only to the solution prone <br />soil salt content and does not take into account the salt content <br />of rock fragments that can be yielded by a combination of <br />mechanical and chemical .weathering processes that occur in the <br />stream transport of sediment. <br /> <br />The salt delivery percentage is not always a direct relationship <br />with the sediment delivery percentage. In the Colorado Plateau, <br />as well as in the intermountain basin region, streams will trap <br />sediment in channel bar and bank deposits. In some very active <br />streams with dominant mechanical weathering characteristics the <br />salt content of stream sediments is yielded long before the <br />sediment is transported out of the watershed and may even be <br />yielded before the sediment is trapped in deposition within the <br />watershed. The decision of what percentage of salt is contained. <br />in a sediment yield load and how much of that percentage is. <br />yielded is a matter of a combination of empirical analyses and <br />judgement based on experience and observed .stream transport <br />characteristics. <br /> <br />Modification 6: It is proposed that the numerical sediment yield <br />classification system be reversed to reflect that the highest <br />sediment yield be given the highest category rating. The present <br />rating of low numerical rating for high sediment yield class has. <br />led to considerable confusion. It is also proposed that the five <br />categories of sediment yield be given written characterizations <br />that will allow for consistent written accounts of the severity. <br />. of sediment yield categories. The proposed written <br />classifications are as follows: <br /> <br />Old Class New Class Range (ac-ft/sq mi) Description <br /> 1 5 > 3.0 very High <br /> 2 4 1. 0-3.0 High <br /> 3 3 0.5-1.0 Moderately High <br /> 4 2 0.2-0.5 Moderate <br /> 5 1 < 0.2 Low <br /> <br />It is recommended that the point rating be eliminated from the <br />above classification scheme because in the original PSIAC there <br />is a discrepancy between the 75 point class limit and the <br />assigned sediment yield value of 1.0 acre-feet/square mile (75 <br />points is equal to 1.225 acre-feet/square mile). The use of <br />acre-feet for the development of classification is adequate for <br />rating purposes. <br />