Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />SlJmlARY (cont inued) <br /> <br />J.-4 <br />o <br />w <br />(.::; <br /> <br />extremes as well as average conditions are reflected in the resultinR <br />probabilities of occurrence, thereby providing a more complete view of <br />future salinity conditions. <br /> <br />It has been assumed for purposes of this stuny that the average annual <br />rate of pickup of dissolved solids from newly irrigated lands would be in <br />the range of zero to 2 tons per acre (zero to 4.5 t/ha) per year. This <br />assumption is baserl upon previous detailed studies. Where comprehensive <br />studies showed a different rate, the different figure was usen. The effect <br />of salt contrihuted from new lands is thus evaluated by co~putations of <br />salinity concentrations using these rates. It was also assump.d no increase <br />in the rate of pickup of dissolved solids would occur for lands already <br />under irrigation. Large industries such as powerplants were considered to <br />have no return of salts or water, and SAlt load changes dlJe to mllnicipal <br />ann minor industries were a~sumed negligible. <br /> <br />The estimated concentrations in milligrams per liter prujected for <br />1990, 2000, and 2010 conditions, without salinity control measures, are as <br />follows: <br /> <br /> 1990 2000 2010 <br /> Zero Two Zero T'NO Zero Two <br /> T/A T/A CRSS T/A T/A CRSS T/A T/A CRSS <br />. Lees Ferry 670 690 592 703 730 656 709 736 680 <br />Hoover Dam 831 853 697 883 913 766 898 928 805 <br /> Parker Dam 853 878 730 912 946 808 928 %3 851 <br /> Imperial [)am 1021 1055 859 1093 1141 969 1112 1161 1019 <br /> <br />Since the above figures from Table D and Table E wer~ computed by us- <br />ing average values, they show only average conditions. Actual conditions <br />will produce years of higher flow, producing better quality water, or years <br />of lower flow producing, poorer quality water. <br /> <br />The depletions used in this report ar.e for the projects, both author- <br />ized and proposed for authorization together with present developments and <br />other proposals for developments as presently planneci. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This report includes discussions of the effect of salinity on water <br />uses and potential salinity control measures. Investigations of the poten- <br />tial for water quality improvement on the Colorado River were initiated by <br />the Water and Power Resources Service (formerly the Bureau of Reclamation) <br />in fiscal year 1972. A report, "Colorado River Water Quality Improvement <br />Program," dated February 1972, describes potential projects for controlling <br />the salinity of the Colorado River. A second reportJ "Colorado River Water <br />Quality Improvement Program, Status Report," was published by the Water and <br />Power Resources Service in January 1974. This report, with appropriate <br />updating by current investigations, is the basis for the discussion of the <br />Colorado River Salinity Control program presented in Part VIII. This <br />evaluation of the program is made in accordance with requirements of the <br />Colorado River Salinity Control Act, Public Law 93-320. The Final Environ- <br />mental Impact Statement for the Colorado River Water Quality Improvement <br /> <br />3 <br />