Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />w <br />-~ <br />~ <br /> <br />QUALITY OF WATER <br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br />PROGRESS REPORT <br /> <br />SUMI>lARY <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This report prepared and updated every 2 years presents the various <br />important water quality aspects of the Colorado River. Although several <br />water quality parameters are discussed, the major part of the report is <br />allotted to salinity (total dissolved solids) because it is presently the <br />most serious quality problem on the river system. The historical, present <br />modified, and future salinity conditions of the water~ of the Cotorano <br />River down to Imperial Dam are presented in this report. The historical is <br />represented by a tabulation of the recorded or e~timated pA~t condition at <br />20 quality of water stations for the 1941-78 period. Although various <br />other studies have included different periods of records such as the 1906 <br />to present period, this report has used the 1941-78 period because most <br />salinity records in the basin do not extend back beyond about 1941. Thc <br />present (1978) modified condition includes adjustments to the historic <br />condition hased on the assumption that all developments existing in 1978 <br />were in operation for the full 1941-78 period. Estimated future conditions <br />are shown for the years 1990, 2000, and 2010. They are estimated projec- <br />tions, including past projects, presently authorized developments, projects <br />proposed for authorization, and other future anticipated projects. <br /> <br />Under historic conditions the flow weighted average concentration of <br />dissolved solids of the Colorado River at Lees Ferry was' about 560 mg/L, <br />below Hoover Dam about 692 mg/L, below Parker Dam about 696 mg/L, and at <br />Imperial Dam about 769 mg/L for the 1941-78 period. <br /> <br />Under present modified conditions (that is 1941-78 historical flows <br />modified to reflect present depletions), the concentrations would llave been <br />about 621, 760, 788, and 878 m~/L, respectively, at the three stations. <br /> <br />For the data in Table D the projection of future water quality <br />conditions was based on 1941-78 averages rather than a year-by-year study. <br />These data were developed usin~ the present modified method as in the past. <br /> <br />The Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) was also used for future <br />water quality projections. A description of the model is given in Part X, <br />Special Studies, alon~ with the projections. We feel that the model <br />will produce better water quality forecasts due to its ability to more <br />accurately describe the river basin and its greater degree of flexibility. <br />We anticipate that all future progress reports will show only the CRSS <br />results. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The CRSS flow and salinity projections in Table F and Table G, Part X, <br />Special Studies section are considered preliminary for several reasons. <br />The hydrologic data base for the computer model was not completed beyond <br />1974. It was intended to use a data base from 1906 to 1978. Also, time <br />did not allow thorou~h checking of the projections against the input data <br />to insure proper operation of the model. The projections found in Table D <br />based on annual averages remain our best estimate at this time. <br /> <br />I <br />