My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03571
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:49:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
9/25/2000
Title
Record of Decision - Animas-La Plata Project/Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Record of Decision
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />F. National Register of Historic Places and Native American Graves Protection and <br />Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) Plan <br /> <br />The FSEIS attaches an amended programmatic agreement which sets forth the procedures to be <br />followed to ensure compliance with the historic preservation laws. Also included is a plan which <br />addresses the treatment of human remains, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony <br />discovered as a result of the Project activity. This plan ensures that the Department is in <br />compliance with the provisions ofNAGPRA <br /> <br />G. Department's Indian Trust Responsibility <br /> <br />The prirnary goal of the recommended federal action is to implement the Colorado Ute Indian Water <br />Rights final Settlement Agreement by providing the Colorado Ute Tribes with benefits consistent <br />with those contemplated under the 1938 Settlement. RA4 would achieve this goal. RA4 was also <br />developed to minimize the impacts of the original ALP on the other tribes in the San Juan Basin and <br />to provide some much-needcd certainty upon which to base future watcr planning and development <br />in the basin. Thc Department believes that the principles outlined in RA4 (a smaller reservoir <br />limited to 57,100 af of depletions that can be operated consistent with the San Juan River Basin <br />Recovery Implementation Program (SJRBRIP)) are beneficial to the Navajo Nation and Jicarilla <br />Apache Tribe. RA4 would preserve the 1933 Scttlement and avoid the prospect of the Colorado Ute <br />Tribes asserting water rights in court that may eventually conflict with those of the Navajo Nation <br />and the Jicarilla Apache Tribe. RA4 would also effect a downsizing of the original ALP which <br />avoids a future conflict between the downstream tribes and beneficiaries of the larger project. The <br />original ALP envisioned 149,000 acre feet of depletion from the San Juan Basin. Although this <br />amount of depletion has not received ESA section 7 clearance, it is evident that the larger the <br />depletion for ALP the less water there will be available under section 7 for other Indian water <br />projects thai have a federal nexus. RA4 also provides a water supply and delivery system for the <br />benefit of the Navajo Nation. <br /> <br />There is, however, a potentially negative effect which RA4 may have on Indian trust assets in the <br />San Juan basin. Due to endangered species concerns and other complexities associated with the <br />"Law ofthe Colorado River," developing a water supply for the Colorado Ute Tribes may presently <br />limit the amount of water available for use by the other tribes. This is a significant concern to the <br />Department and one sought to be addressed by the commitments discussed below. As discussed in <br />the FSEIS, though, it is somewhat premature to conclude that development of a down-sized ALP <br />will preclude further federally-related water development in the San Juan basin. The most critical <br />factor at this time is the habitat needs of endangered species in the basin. Those needs are constantly <br />being reviewed and will certainly be evaluated in light of any future water development proposals <br />as part of the ESA consultation process. It is possible that Reclamation, working with other relevant <br />agencies, could develop measures, including specific water management strategies, which would <br />allow further tribal water development to move forward. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.