My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03570
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:49:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.33.K
Description
15-Mile Reach (UCRBRIP)
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1995
Author
Leonard Rice
Title
Palisade/Grand Junciton Stream Flow Analyses Update for 1994 Data
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />USFWS - Palisade/Grand Junction Stream Flow Analyses - DRAFT <br />May 12, 1995 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />III GAGING STATION RECORDS <br /> <br />III.1 27.5 Road Gage <br /> <br />Richard D. Piland and Associates (Piland) collected and interpreted streamflow data from <br />. a Stevens recorder at the 27.5 Road Gage site during the later months of 1991 through <br />1994. The rating curves developed to determine the flow rates are shown in Figure 2. <br />The following comments are provided on the rating curves used to determine the <br />discharge. <br /> <br />.1991-1992: Piland prepared a stage discharge relationship for the site based on <br />current meter measurements of 707 cubic feet per second (cfs) and 1,313 cfs in <br />1991 and 646 cfs and 2,112 cfs in 1992. Please note that flows were experienced <br />in 1992 that exceeded 2,112 cfs which may affect the calculated local inflows. <br /> <br />1993: Three measurements were taken at 1,040 cfs, 1,483 cfs, and 2,312 cfs in <br />1993. The 1991 and 1992 rating curves were similar however, the 1993 rating <br />curve shows a +0.18 foot shift. Mr. Piland attributed the change to a raise in the <br />rock ripple control caused by above average snowmelt runoff in 1993 which likely <br />deposited sediments at the controL Had the rating curve not been modified in 1993 <br />the result would have been an over estimate of the flows by about 200 cfs. Again <br />we caution the reader that flows were experienced in 1993 that exceeded 2,312 cfs <br />and, therefore, that part-Of the rating curve remains unconfirmed. <br /> <br />12.21;. Five flow measurements were taken in 1994 ranging from 691 cfs to 2,413 <br />cfs to develop the discharge rating curve. The discharge measurements made in <br />1994 support the rating curve developed in 1993 with a slight shift at the higher <br />measured flows (> 2,000 cfs). This indicates that sediments believed deposited in <br />1993 at the control section were not flushed out in 1994. Measured flows during <br />July through December ranged from 500 cfs to 2,950 cfs. <br /> <br />Over the past four years one significant and several small shifts in the rating curve have <br />been observed. This implies that stream flow measurements will need to be made each <br />year to verify the rating curve, which is consistent with U.S.G.S. practices. If operation <br />of the 27.5 Road Gage is to be continued for evaluation of local inflows to the critical <br />reach then a minimum of at least one stream flow measurement per year is recommended. <br />If a shift is suspected additional flow measurements should be made to define the new <br />stage discharge relationship. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.