My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03570
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:49:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.33.K
Description
15-Mile Reach (UCRBRIP)
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1995
Author
Leonard Rice
Title
Palisade/Grand Junciton Stream Flow Analyses Update for 1994 Data
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />USFWS - Palisade/Grand Junction Stream Flow Analyses - DRAFT <br />May 12, 1995 <br />'Page 17 <br /> <br />Table 1 is a comparison of the precipitation recorded at the Grand Junction Airport <br />station during the July through December period in 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994 with long <br />term. averages. This table general1y confirms that the 1991 and 1992 October and <br />November period, and August 1993 was wetter than average as stated by the irrigation <br />managers in the area. Also, in 1994 July and August were much drier than average and <br />previous years. <br /> <br /> Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total <br />1991 .40 .57 2.30 1.20 1.10 .54 6.11 <br />1992 1.03 .84 .33 1.45 .76 .35 4.76 <br />1993 .04 1.42 .41 1.34 .41 .57 4.19 <br />1994 .01 .48 1.50 .58 .69 .64 3.90 <br />Long Term Avg. ,65 .81 .82 .98 .71 .61 4.58 <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Precipitation Comparison in Inches <br />Grand Junction Airport <br /> <br />Based on Figure 5 and interviews with local irrigation company officials, we believe that <br />local precipitation can produce significant runoff spikes into the Colorado River, that are <br />relatively short lived. In 1992, the large amount of precipitation at the end of October <br />may have contributed to offsetting the characteristic drop in local inflows that was <br />experienced in November of 1991, 1993, and 1994 after the local irrigation diversions <br />ceased. <br /> <br />V.3 Diversion Dam Operations vs Local Inflow <br /> <br />Based on discussions in 1993 with Mr. Bil1 Klapwyck of the Grand Val1ey Water Users <br />Association, we believe that the operation of the Cameo rol1er dam can significantly alter <br />the calculations of local inflow to the critical reach. These operations are believed to <br />affect the calculation of local inflow greatest when 1) irrigation diversions are ceased in <br />the late fal1, and 2) when power generation is initiated in the late fal1 or early winter. In <br />general, at the end of the irrigation season not only are diversions terminated but water <br />stored behind the Cameo roller dam is released. -Then after maintenance activities are <br />completed the rol1er dam gates are lowered and water is stored to develop the head <br />necessary to make winter diversions on the order of 800 cfs for power generation. <br /> <br />In 1991, 1993 and 1994 the characteristic drop in estimated local inflows coincides with <br />the end of irrigation diversions as shown in Figure 8. In 1992, the abundance of <br />precipitation at the end of October makes the interpretation more difficult. We believe <br />what is happening is that when diversions end and water stored behind the rol1er dam is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.