My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03545
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:59 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:49:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.40.J
Description
Yampa
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
4/3/1995
Title
A Method for Assessing Hydrologic Alteration within Ecosystems
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />many different types of stress. <br /> <br />vi) Indices should be sufficiently sensitive and timely, such that they quickly <br /> <br />register ecosystem responses to stresses and perturbations. <br /> <br />vii) Indices must allow comparison of measured conditions to a reference condition <br /> <br />or scale of reference conditions based on field data or extrapolationS from these <br /> <br />data. <br /> <br />Many of theccharacteristics-:ofhydrologic::data,collection and analysis have facilitated~ <br />, . '_0"""""',. <br /> <br />the development of the IHA method while meeting most of these desired attributes. In~t <br /> <br />to biological monitoring, hydrologic data collection tends to be highly standardized in.lI!OS!';4 <br /> <br />countries; data have been collected for relatively long time periods (which often predate <br />;~/~~.'- , <br />. '::'-'-- ,'-'-{-".'.,- <br />substantial hydrologic alterations); measurements are commonly obtained from continuo~. ,c5::" <br /> <br />recording gauges and summarized as daily means; access to these data is usually centra1izeAf.:: <br /> <br />-., ',",>/'; <br /> <br />~oi->~,',:~-, <br /> <br />and readily available; and; monitoring networks are comparatively dense (e.g., more 1:hllm. ; <br /> <br />20,000 streamgauging stations have been established in the U.S. by the U.S. GeologicaL' .."t <br /> <br />Survey). The availabilitycof long periods;ofrecord and the relative density of monitoriIl&4-c f <br /> <br />networks also greatly facilitates definition ofa pre. impact or less.a1tered.hydrologic reference, <br /> <br />state for a site of interest. <br /> <br />Although the IHA method results in the computation of a suite of biologically.relev.aDt.;,' <br />. _ , ...u_. .,~ <br /> <br /> <br /><:t"-- <br />hydrologic indicators, these indicators are not combined into a single index.. The intentg,~J? <br /> <br />'-','-' <'....,- <br /> <br />lHA method in its current form is to identify the direction and magnitude of change in.sp.ec!!i.s-: <br /> <br />components of a hydrologic regime in response to a perturbation or management action,:!1~!:1e: <br /> <br />provide a single measure of ecosystem integrity. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.