My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03541
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03541
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:58 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:49:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8126.700
Description
Arkansas River Coordinating Committee - Committees - Subcommittees
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
11/1/1994
Author
Texas Water Develop
Title
Texas Water Bank
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />year in the early 1980s, but is projected to be approximately 7.3 million acre- <br />feet per year in the year 2000, attributable to increased agricultural water use <br />efficiency and reductions in total irrigated acres due to adverse economic <br />conditions." Preliminary studies conducted in the consensus water planning <br />effort have identified that significant reductions in irrigation (surface water) <br />are projected to occur primarily in some areas of the Rio Grande and in the <br />irrigated agricultural zone along the Texas Gulf Coast. Generally speaking, <br />the following counties may be affected: Matagorda, Jefferson, Colorado, <br />Maverick, Cameron, Brazoria, Wharton, Chambers, Liberty, and Medina. <br />These studies also indicate that in 1990, the total irrigation water usage was <br />approximately equivalent to 56% of the total water used in the state. <br /> <br />Scarcity Of Water (usually expressed as fully-appropriated surface waters) <br /> <br />* According to TNRCC, there is little or no water available for new, permanent <br />appropriation in these basins: (1) the Canadian River upstream of Lake <br />Meredith; (2) the Red River upstream of Lakes Kemp and Arrowhead; (3) <br />Cypress Creek upstream of Lake O' the Pines; (4) the Sabine River <br />upstream of Lakes Tawakoni and Fork; (5) the Neches River upstream of <br />Lake Palestine; (6) the Trinity River upstream from Dallas/Ft. Worth <br />reservoirs; (7) the Brazos River upstream from Possum Kingdom Lake; (8) <br />the Colorado River; (9) the Guadalupe River upstream of Canyon and Coleto <br />Creek Reservoirs; (10) the San Antonio River upstream from Lake Medina; <br />(11) the Nueces River upstream from Zavala/Dimmit Counties water rights; <br />and (12) the entire Rio Grande, based on TNRCC's A ReQulatory Guidance <br />Document for ADDlications to Divert. Store. or uSe State Water--A DRAFT, <br />March 22, 1994.7 <br /> <br />Limited Availability Of Other Water Supplies (nonnally ground wateQ <br /> <br />* In 1990, ground water was estimated to provide 36% of the total water used <br />in the state (6.702 million acre-feet). By 2040 the amount of groundwater <br />used is expected to drop to 5.698 million acre-feet or approximately or <br />approximately 30% of the total water used statewide.s Areas experiencing <br />subsidence, salt water intrusion, and/or overdraftlng are most likely to exhibit <br />a need tD shift to other sources of water supply. In a 1994 report, the <br />following areas were characterized by declining ground-water levels: the El <br /> <br />S Texas Water Development Board, Water for Texas: Today and Tomorrow, p. 3-5, <br />December 1990, Document No. GP-5-1. <br /> <br />7 This draft guidance document was revised as of October 4, 1994, according to Texas <br />Natural Resource Conservation Commission staff, fax dated November 10, 1994 from Mark Jordan, <br />TNRCC. <br /> <br />8 Texas Water Development Board, op. cit., p. 3-2, 1990. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.