Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />nDn:i'1" <br /> <br />- 5 - <br /> <br />specific minerals or compounds and the rates at which they may enter <br />ground waters. <br /> <br />Conflicting with the danger of ground water pollution, is the <br />need for application of additional irrigation water beyond plant <br />growth needs to avoid the accumulation of excessive amounts of salts <br />in the root zone. The ~inerals applied in irrigation water will <br />accumulate unless the soil is p~riodically flushed of salts. <br /> <br />Although the total mineral content varies from a low to high <br />salinity hazard from farm to farm in the Blue River Basin, the aver- <br />age would be in the medium ranGe. This cal13 for a leaching require- <br />ment of 10-15 percent additional water above crop requirement. This <br />may be provided by precipitation m03t years but added irrigation wa- <br />ter may be needed for this purpose. This would occur when rainfall <br />plus irrigation is only equal to or less than the water needed for <br />crop requirement plus the 15% leaching requirement. <br /> <br />An alkali hazard may also exist in localized areas such as cen- <br />tral Saline County. Chemical amendments with additional leaching May <br />be needed to counteract this problem. On these farms it may be nece- <br />ssary to aF-ply 30~ more irrigation \.:atel' to meet leaching needs. <br /> <br />\1A TER USES <br /> <br />Most row crops will use from 23-)111 net water <br />through harvest in the evapotranspiration process. <br />would be supplied partly by effective rai~fall and <br />irrigation water. <br /> <br />from planting time <br />This requirement <br />the remainder by <br /> <br />Research by the Agronomy Department, University of Nebraska, <br />showed an increase of crop consumptive use of approximately III of <br />additional water when adequate fertilizer was applied for maximum <br />yields of corn, grain sorghum and wheat. This increased crop con- <br />sumptive water use, however, is more than offset by the increased <br />efficiency of soil water in producing crain as shown in Table 3. <br /> <br />Table 3 <br />NEAN C"IT PRODUCTION PER INCH 0,' \'IA r?:R COl1SUNPTIVELY BY CROP <br /> <br />No Fertilizer Fe!'tilizer Applied % Yield Increase <br />Corn 2,98 cwt. 4,26 cwt. 43 <br />Grai n Sorghum 2.99 3,81 28 <br />Wheat 1.41 1.58 12 <br /> <br />Good fertilizer p!'Bctices means more cwt of grain from the water <br />applied and is therefore a good practice for gaining the most benefit <br />from our water resources. The research on which Table 3 is based alse <br />showed that additional water was needed when the crop was adequately <br />fertilized. One additional inch of water, for example, was required <br />to increase the yield of corn from an average of 91 bushels to 133 <br />bushels per acre. Nebraska agricultural statistics show that in 1965 <br />average yields of irrigated corn were 96 bushels in the East and South <br />regions. <br />