Laserfiche WebLink
<br />110"'85 <br />_ Li.... <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Establishing field input conditions, Soil associations were trans- <br /> <br /> <br />ferred to the computer model grid system from soil survey maps of Sedgwick <br /> <br /> <br />and Logan counties (USDA, 1969; USDA, 1977). The soil series making up <br /> <br /> <br />these associations were determined and evaluated as to texture and slope. <br /> <br /> <br />Each grid point associated with an irrigation area (i.e., ditch) was <br /> <br /> <br />identified by the appropriate soil association. The number of grid <br /> <br /> <br />points of each soil association was tabulated for each irrigation area. <br /> <br /> <br />The Soil Conservation Service intake family (USDA, 1974) was determined <br /> <br /> <br />for each soil association, based upon its surface texture, using Figure 2. <br /> <br />These intake families are the water intake rate of the soil in inches <br /> <br /> <br />per hour at extended times. The soil series information gave information <br /> <br /> <br />on land slopes. The average soil association properties for the study <br /> <br /> <br />reach are summarized in Table 5. <br /> <br />Table 5, <br /> <br />Soil Association Average Properties <br />Lower Platte River Valley Irrigated Land, Colorado <br /> <br />. Plan t <br /> Field <br />Soil availa ble Surface Intake irrig. <br />association water Slope texture family eff. <br /> (in. ) (%) (in. /hr. -1) (ea. ) <br />2 L 8,4 1 - 3 loam 0.9 0.45 <br />3 L 11. 6 0 1 si. c. loam 0.6 0.55 <br />4 L 5.3 5 + 1. sand 2.0 0.45 <br />5 L 5,7 5 + 1. sand 2.0 0,45 <br />7 L 5.4 5 + f. s, loam 1.5 0.45 <br />9 L 5.7 3 - 5 loam 0.9 0.45 <br />11 L 10,7 5 + loam 0.9 0.30 <br />14 L 11. 7 5 + loam 0,9 0.30 <br />2 S 11.0 1 - 3 loam 0,9 0.45 <br />3 S 8.4 1 - 3 loam 0.9 0.45 <br />4 S 4.4 5 + f. sand 3.4 0.30 <br />5 S 6,0 5 + gravelly sa loam 2.0 0.45 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Determination of initial values of farm irrigation system efficiencies. <br /> <br /> <br />As indicated earlier, there is no information on farm irrigation system effi- <br /> <br /> <br />ciencies which relate this parameter to slope, requirement and intake. How- <br /> <br /> <br />ever, it is recognized that the parameter is indeed dependent upon these <br /> <br />-28- <br />