Laserfiche WebLink
<br />recommended project was very nearly the same as the project configuration <br />proposed by the District and described in the FERC Preliminary Permit <br />Appl ication. <br /> <br />The main difference between the project configuration originally <br />proposed by the District and the preferred configuration identified during <br />the Authority's Basin Study was the location of the damsite for the mainstem <br />reservoir. The preferred damsite for the mainstem reservoir identified <br />during the Basin Study is immediately below the confluence of the mainstem <br />and North Fork of the Cache la Poudre River. This site is approximately 2 <br />miles upstream of the Grey Mountain Damsite originally proposed by the <br />District, and was identified as the preferred damsite only because <br />inundating 2 miles less of the Cache la Poudre mainstem would reduce <br />environmental impacts. However, insufficient data existed to warrant an <br />unreserved recommendation of this site, and the Basin Study recommended the <br />Grey Mountain Damsite, originally considered by the District, as an <br />alternative damsite for the mainstem reservoir. <br /> <br />Using funding provided by the private entity interested in marketing <br />the hydroelectric generating capacity of the proposed project, the District <br />had initiated consultations with a number of Federal and State resource <br />agencies and had begun detailed studies to assess various impacts on key <br />environmental resources to test project feasibility. However, during the <br />months following publication of the Authority's final report in January <br />1987, the private entity involved in marketing the hydroelectric generating <br />capacity of the proposed project was unable to continue financing the <br />District's environmental studies due to changing economic conditions. <br /> <br />Because of the resulting funding restrictions, it became necessary for <br />the District to temporarily suspend studies concerning the pumped-storage <br />hydroelectric components of the proposed project. Additionally, without <br />potential revenues from the pumped-storage hydroelectric generating capacity <br />of the project, a re-evaluation of the water supply components of the <br />proposed project was also appropriate. Because of the need to complete key <br />environmental studies in order to test the feasibility of any water storage <br />project in the Poudre Basin, the District applied to the Authority for <br />funding to extend the Basin Study. ihe Authority agreed to extend the Basin <br />Study to complete the key environmental studies and perform additional <br />engineering and economic analyses to preliminarily assess the feasibility of <br />a water storage project in the Cache la Poudre Basin without pumped-storage <br />hydroelectric components. <br /> <br />3.0 DESCRIPTION OF STAGED PROJECT <br /> <br />To facilitate the preliminary feasibility evaluation, the District has- <br />proposed that the Cache la Poudre Project, as originally configured, be <br />divided into three separate and distinct stages. Each stage would be <br />studied, evaluated, and implemented separately, if feasible. The three <br />stages are described as follows: <br /> <br />- 3 - <br />