My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03527
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:53 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:47:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
822.600.10
Description
Colorado River Annual Operating Plan - Annual Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/2003
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Annual Operating Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />habitat area (Farmington to Lake Powell). The Flow Recommendations call for an 3\'Cragc weekly <br />flow of between 500 cfs (14 ems) and 1.000 cfs (28 ems) in this reach of the river. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation has begun a National Environmental Policy Act (NEP A) process on the implementation <br />of an operation at Navajo Dam that meets these Flow Recommendations or a reasonable alternative <br />to them. A Notice of Inten! to prepare an Environmentallmpac! Statement (EIS) was filed on <br />OClober I. 1999. in the Federal Register. A draft EIS was released on September 4. 2002. The <br />completion oflhe final EIS and Record of Decision is scheduled to occur in 2003. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Under the most probable and maximum probable inflow scenarios during water year 2003. ~avajo <br />Reservoir is not expected to fill. Releases from the reser\"oir will be held near 500 cfs (14 ems) <br />through the fall and winter months and large releases will likely be made in .\lay and June pursuant <br />to thc Flow Recommendations to improve the habitat and provide better spawning conditions for <br />endangered fish in the San Juan River. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />lake PO\'tell <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />lake Powell began water year 2002 \\'ith 20.9 maf(25.800 mem) of storage (86 percent of capacity). <br />From October 2001 through Januarv 2002. releases from Glen Canvon Dam were scheduled to <br />~ . . . <br />achicve equalization ofstorage belween Lake i\.1ead and Lake Powell by the end of water year 2002 <br />in accordance with Anic1e 11(3) of the Operating Criteria. Inllow projections were reduced in <br />February, 2002 with forecasted April through July unregulated inflow to Lake Powell only 7.7 maf <br />(5,800 mcm) or 59 percent of average. This forecast was sufficiently low that storage equalization no <br />longer became the governing criterion in the 2002 operation. From February. 2002 through the end <br />of the water year. releases were scheduled 10 maintain the minimum release objective from lake <br />Powell of 8.23 maf (10.150 mcm) for water year 2002 in accordance with Anicle 11(2) of the <br />Operating Criteria. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />April through July unregulated inflow into Lake Powell in waler year 2002 was 1.12 maf (1.380 <br />mcm). or 14 percent ofavcrage. Water year 2002 unregulated inflow was 3.06 maf(3.770 mcm). or <br />25 percent of average. Unregulated inflow in 2002 was the lowest recorded since the closure of Glen <br />Canyon Dam. The previous low occurred in 1977. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Lake Powell nonnally increases in elevation during the April through JulyrunofTperiod. Inflow was <br />so low in the spring of 2002. however. that reservoir storage in lake Powell continued to decline <br />throughout the runoff period. The elevation of Lake Powell on September 30. 2002 was 3.626.5 feet <br />(1.105.4 meters) (73.5 feet from full). Lake Powell ended water year 2002 with 14.5 maf(17.800 <br />mcm) of storage (59 percent of capacity). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />On April 24. 2002. membcrs of the Glen Canyon Adaptive Managemenl Work Group (AM\\'G) <br />recommended to the Secretary that a two-year experimental flow lest be made from Glen Canyon <br />Dam beginning in water vear 2003. The recommendation addressed the decline of two kc\' resources <br />~ ~ . . <br />in the Grand Canyon: sediment and population viability of endangered humpback chub. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation. the :'\ational Park Service. and the Uniled States Geological Survey have jointly <br /> <br />December 13. 2002 <br /> <br />1-1 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.