Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />September 2002 <br />OClober 2002 <br /> <br />100 efs (2.8 ems) <br />o cfs (0 ems) <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Additionally, the CRWCD entered into a contract with Redlands to compensate Redlands for lost <br />hydropower revenues due 10 the reduced waler diversions. and Seel Energy Company made <br />temporary modifications to Redlands hydropower contract 10 make the compensation costs <br />reasonable. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />In water year 1002. the Aspinall Unit was operated in cooperation \vith this shared shortage <br />agreement to provide benefits to water users and fish and wildlife. including endangered fish. while <br />minimizing the dra\.... on unit storage 10 a reasonable extent. As was formally agreed by all parties, <br />pursuant to the aforementioned agreements. water year 2002 operations were undertaken to lessen <br />the impacts of the severe drought conditions to a reasonable extent. and do not establish or set any <br />precedent that such operations will continue or occur again in the future. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In January 2000. a draft report titled. "Flow Recommendations to Benefit Endangered Fishes in the <br />Colorado and Gunnison Rivers" was submitted to the Upper Colorado River Recovery Program _ <br />Biology Committee. The report compiles and summarizes the results of research conducted on <br />endangered fish in the Gunnison and Colorado Rivers under the Upper Colorado Recovery Program. <br />ThiS report presents flow recommendations for t\VO different river reaches: one for the lower <br />Gunnison River between Delta and Grand Junction. Colorado. and the other for the Colorado River <br />downstream of the Gunnison River confluence. Based upon comments and objections by numerous <br />parties, these flow recommendations are undergoing additional review. It is anticipated that <br />revisions to the draft repon will be completed in late 2002 or early 2003. Following the issuance of <br />final flow recommendations. Reclamation intends to initiate a National Environmental Policy Act <br />compliance process to detemline the impacts of the flow recommendations. or a reasonable <br />alternative to them. on Aspinall Unit operations and on other resources associated with the Gunnison <br />River. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />On January 17. 2001. the National Park Service. through the Department of Justice. filed an <br />application to quantify the federal reserved water right decreed to the Black Canyon of the Gunnison <br />National l\.tonument. The water right is for flows in the Gunnison River through the Black Canyon <br />of the Gunnison National Park do\vnstream of the Gunnison Tunnel. Reclamation is continuing to <br />work with the National Park Service and Western Area Power Administration. using a daily time <br />step computer model. to evaluate the effects of a reserved water right on Aspinall Unit operations. <br />The: model will also be use:d in conjunction with the State ofColorado's model to analyze the effects <br />of the reserved righl and the flow recommendations for endangered fish. once the flow <br />recommendations have been completed. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />For water year 2003. the Aspinall Unit will be operated in accordance with the Colorado River <br />Storage Project Act to conserve storage while meeting downstream delivery requirements. Under <br />nomlal conditions. the minimum release objectives of the Aspinall Unit are to meet the deliyery <br />requirements of the Uncompahgre Valley Project. maintain a flow of 300 cfs (8.5 cms) in the <br />Gunnison River through the Black Canyon of the Gunnison i\ational Park. and maintain a minimum <br />Oow ofJOO cfs (8.5 cms) in the 2-mile reach below the Redlands Di\.crsion Dam during the summer <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />December 13. 2002 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />I <br />