Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2003 RESERVOIR OPERATlO'iS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The regulation of the Colorado River has had effects on downstream aquatic and riparian resources. <br />Controlled releases from dams have modified temperature. sediment load. and flow patterns. <br />resulting in increased productivity of some introduced aquatic resources and the de\"clopmcnt of <br />economically significant span fisheries. Howevcr. these same releases have detrimental effects on <br />endangered and other native species. Operating strategies designed to protect and enhance <br />downstream aquatic and riparian resources have been established at se....erallocations in the Colorado <br />River basin. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Modifications to planned operations may' be made based on changes in forecast conditions. <br />Howevcr. due to the RecO\'ery Implememation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin (Upper Colorado Recovery Program). Section 7 consultations. and other <br />downstream concerns. modification to the monthly operation plans may be based on other factors in <br />addition to changes in streamflo\l,' forecasts. Decisions on spring peak releases and downstream <br />habitat target flows may be made midway through the runoff season, Reclamation and the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service will initiate meetings with imerested parties. including representatives of the Basin <br />States. to facilitate the decisions necessary to finalize site~specific operations plans. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Reclamation completed Section 7 consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service in April 2002 on <br />current and projected discretionary routine lower Colorado River operations and maintenance <br />activities for a period of up 10 3 years. On an annual basis. Reclamation's compliance with <br />environmental commitments related to the April 1997 and 2002 Biological Opinions are reported to <br />the Fish and Wildlife Service. The most recent report documenting Reclamation's compliance \'.lith <br />these commitments is dated April 2002. Reclamation's compliance with additional environmental <br />commitments. related to adoption of the Interim Surplus Guidelines. will continue to be addressed in <br />future annual reports. as appropriate. Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service have also <br />fomled a partnership with other federal. state. and private agencies to develop the Lower Colorado <br />River ~lulti.Species Conseryation Program. This program permits both non federal and federal <br />panics to participate and address Endangered Species Act (ESA) compliance requirements under <br />Sections 7 and JOofthe ESA. <br /> <br />The following paragraphs discuss the operation of each of the reservoirs with respcct [0 compact. <br />dccree. and statutory' watcr delivery obligations, and instrcam flow necds for maintaining or <br />improving aquatic resources, where appropriate. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Fonrenelle Resen'oir <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Precipitation and ensuing runoff in the Upper Green River Basin during water year 2002 were well <br />below normal for Ihe third year in a row. The April through July runoff into Fontenelleduring \\'aler <br />year 1001 was 0.330 ~IAF (407 ~ICM). or 38 percent ofnonnal. Inflow peaked at 4,400 cfs (115 <br />ems) on June 3.2002. Releases in excess ofpowerplant capacity were not required from Fontenelle <br />Reservoir in 2002. ~1aximum releases in 1002 were at powerplant capacity (approximately 1500cfs <br />(40 ems)) from May S. 2002 to :Vlay IS, 2002. Fontcnelle Reseryoir reached a peak elevation of <br /> <br />December 13. 1001 <br /> <br />9 <br />