Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2002 OPERATIO;\S SVM.\IARY A;\O RESER\OOlR STATUS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Extremely dry hydrologic conditions were observed in the Colorado River basin in water year 2001. <br />Basinwide precipitation was only ~8 percenl of average and snowpack accumulations were much <br />below nomlal le....e1s. As the spring snowmelt season began on April I. 2001. snowpack levels <br />throughout the Colorado River Basin were generally less than 50 percent ofa\"erage. The situation <br />was particularly severe in the central and southern portions of the Upper Colorado River basin. \tany <br />reservoirs in the Colorado River Basin recorded record low inllows during 1001. These included <br />:-.Ja\'ajo Reservoir. Blue ~tesa Reservoir and Lake Powell. Unregulatedl]! inflow into Lake Powell <br />during the April through July runofTperiod in 2002 was only 1.12 maf( 1.380 mcm) or 14 percent of <br />the 30 year averagel21. Total unregulated inflow into Lake Powell for water year 2002 was only 3.06 <br />maf(3.780 mcm) or 25 percent of average. This was the lowest recorded since the closure ofGlcn <br />Canyon Dam in 1963. The previous low was observed in 1977 when water year unregulated inflow <br />was 3.66 maf(4.510 mcm) or 30 percenl of average. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I\"ot only was water year 2002 a very low year for runoff in the Colorado River basin. but It also <br />marked the third consecutive year with below average inflow into Colorado Ri,"er reservoirs. <br />Reservoir storage continued to decline for the third straight )'ear. Storage in Lake Powell decreased <br />by 4.67 maf (5.760 mcm) in 2002. Storage in reservoirs upstream of Lake Powell decreased by <br />approximately 1.06 maf (1.300 mcm). In Lower Basin reservoirs. storage decreased by 2.80 maf <br />(3.460 mcm). At the beginning of water year 2002. Colorado River total system storage was 76 <br />~ ~. - ~ <br />percent of capacity. Total Colorado River system storage decreased by approximately 8.52 maf <br />(10.500 mcm) during waler year 2002. As of September 30. 2002 total system storage was 64 <br />percent of capacity. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />E,'en Ihough Colorado River reservoir storage has been reduced. during 2002. all deliveries of water <br />10 meet valid obligations pursuant to applicable provisions of "The Law of the River" were <br />maintained. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Preliminary Colorado River water delivery accounting data for calendar year (CY) 2002. compiled <br />pursuant to Article V of the Decree. indicated that requests for walerdcliveries by agricultural users <br />in California during CY 1002 had the pOlential to exceed the maximum amounl of water available <br />under the detemlinations made in the 2001 AOP approved and transmitted on January 14. 2002. In <br />light of the potential for such overuse within Ihe Lower Basin. and after consuhation with members <br />of the CR~1\\'G. a supplement to the 2002 ADP was approved on November 22. 2002. The <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(I) Unregulated inflow adjusts for the effects of operations at upstream reservoirs. It is computed <br />by adding the change in storage. and the evaporation losses from upstream reservoirs to the <br />observed intlow. Unregulated inflow is used because it pro,'ides an inflow time series that is not <br />biased by upstream operations. and more closely resembles natural flow conditions. <br />(:'lntlow statistics throughout this documenl will be as compared 10 30 year averages. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />December 13. 2002 <br /> <br />.j <br /> <br />I <br />