Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br /> <br />Federal,Register I Vol.48,No; 217/ Tuesday, Novembe, 8, 1983 / Rules and Regulatipns, '51407,:1 <br />I <br /> <br />...... <br />00 <br />W <br />W <br /> <br />demonstrate that attaining the <br />designated use is-.nQl fensible because; <br />[1) Naturally occurring pollutant <br />concentrations. prevent the' attainment of <br />the use; Of -. <br />(2) Natural. ephemeral, intermittent or <br />low flow conditions or water levels <br />prevent the attainmbnt of the use, unless <br />these conditions may be compensated - <br />for by the. dischargsiof sufficient volume <br />of eflluent discharges without violating <br />State 'water conserv~tion requirements <br />to enable uses to helmet; or . , <br />(3) Human caused_ conditions or <br />sources of pollution ,prevent the <br />attainment of the use and cannot be <br />remedied or would a'ause more <br />environmental dam~ge to correct than to <br />leave in place: or <br />(4) Dams. dlversiolls or other types of <br />hydrologic modificat;ions. preclude the <br />attainment of the use, and it is not <br />feasible to restore the water hody to its <br />original condi tion or ~to opera te !juch <br />modification in a way that would result <br />in the attainment of \he use; or <br />(5) Physical conditions related to the <br />'natural features of the water.body. ,such <br />85 the lack of 8. ,proper substrate, cover, <br />flo,w, depth. pools, ril'fles, and the like. <br />,unrelated to water quality. preclude <br />attainmeQt_ of aquatic life protection <br />uses; or <br />(6) Controls more s!ringent than "lhose <br />required by Sections ~01[b) and 306 of <br />the Act would result in substantial and <br />widespread econorniQ, and social impact. <br />(h) States may not remove designated <br />'uses if: ' <br />(1)They are existing uses, as defined <br />hi Section 131.3. 'un)e~s a use requiring <br />more stringent criteria is-added: or <br />(2) Such'uses will be attained by <br />implementing effluent:Umits required. <br />under Sections 301[b);and 306 of the Act <br />and by implementing ~ost'effective and <br />reasonable best mana,gemeot practices <br />for non point source cdntrol. <br />(i) Where existing water quality <br />standards specify designated uses less <br />than those which Bre {.lresently being <br />atttlined, the State shall revise its <br />standards 10 reflect the uses actually <br />.being attained. <br />(j) A State must conduct 8 use' <br />attainability analysis as described in <br />~ 131.3(g) whenever: <br />(1) The State designates or has <br />designated uses that dp not include the <br />uses specified in Section 101(a)[2) of the <br />Act, or <br />(2) The State wishes,to remove a <br />designated use that is .pecified in <br />Section 101(a)(2) of the; Act or to adopt' <br />subcategories of uses specified in <br />Section 101(a)(2) of the'Act which <br />requirer Je$s stringent criteria, <br />(k) A State is not req)Jired to,oond)Jct <br />a use 8t~ain8bility analysis under this <br /> <br />Regulation whenever designating uses <br />which inclu,de those specified in Section, <br />101(a)(2) of the Act. <br /> <br />~ 131.11 Criteria, <br />(a) Inclusion of pollutants; <br />[1) States must adopt those water <br />quality criteria th-at protect the <br />designated uee. Such criteria must be <br />based on sound scientific rationale and <br />must contain sufficient parameters or <br />constituents to protect the designated <br />use, For waters with multiple )JBe ' <br />designations, the criteria'shall support <br />the most- sensitive use. <br />(2) Toxic Pollutants-States must <br />review water quality data and <br />information on dischargel1-to identify <br />specific water_bodies where toxic <br />pollutant, may b~ adversely affecting <br />water quality or the attainment of the <br />designated water use or where the <br />levels of toxic pollutants are at a level to <br />warrant concern arid must adopt. criteria <br />for such toxic pollutants applicable to <br />the water body ,sufficient to protect the <br />designated use,Where a State adopts <br />narrative criteria for toxic pollutants to <br />protect designated uses. the State must <br />provide information identifying the <br />method by which the State intends to <br />regulate point, source discharges of toxic <br />pollutants on water quality limited <br />. segments based on such narrative <br />criteria. Such-'information may be <br />included as part of the standards or may <br />be included in documents generated by <br />the State in response to the Water <br />Quality Planning and Management <br />Regulations (40 CFR Part 35), <br />[b) Form of criteria: In establishing <br />criteria, States, should:, <br />(1) Establish numerical values based <br />on: <br />(i) 304[a]Guidance: or <br />(il) 304(a) Guidance modified to reflect <br />site-specific conditions; or <br />(iil) other scientifically defensible <br />methods: <br />(2) establish narrative criteria or <br />criteria based upon biomonitoring <br />" methods where numerical criteria <br />cannot be established or to supplement <br />numerical criteria. <br /> <br />~ 131,12 Antldegradatlon policy. . <br />(a) The State shall develop and adopt <br />a stalewide antidegradation policy and <br />identify the methods for implementing <br />such policy pursuant to this subpart. The <br />antidegradation policy and <br />implementation methods shall, at a <br />minimum, be consistent with the <br />following; <br />(1) Existing instream water uses and <br />the Jevel ofw~ter quality necessary to. <br />protect the exjsting uses shall be <br />maintained and protected. <br /> <br />(2) Where the quality of the waters <br />exceed levels necessary to' ,upport <br />propagation of fish, shellfish, and <br />wildlife and recreation in and on the <br />water, that quality shall be maintained <br />and protected unless the State finds, <br />after full satisfaction of the <br />, intergovernmental. coordination and <br />public participation provisions of the <br />State's continuing plannh1g'. process, that <br />allowing lower water quality is <br />ne'cessary to accommodate, important <br />economic or social development in _-the <br />area in which,the waters are located. In <br />allowing such degradationorlower <br />water quality, the State sha.llassure <br />water'quality adequate to protect ' <br />existing uses fully. Further; the State <br />shall.assure that there shall. be achieved <br />the highest statutofyand regulatory <br />requirements 'for all new, arid existi~ <br />point sources and all cnst-effective and <br />reasollable best l11anagemelll pracUces <br />for n6nPQi~t sou,ree control. <br /> <br />(3) Where high q\lality weters <br />constitute an o\ltstaI\ding National, , <br />resource, suc~,as WJlters,of;NaU6nal and <br />State pa~ks and wildlife refuges and ' <br />waters of exceptional recrc8litional or <br />ecological significance,that.water <br />quality shall be maintained and <br />prqtected. <br />(4) In thOse cases where potential <br />water qualityil11pairment associated. <br />with a thermal discharge, is involved, th.. <br />antidegradation policy and <br />implementing method shall be <br />consistent with section 316 of the Act <br /> <br />~ 131.13 Gei1era1 policies. <br /> <br />States may. at their discretion, include <br />in their State standards, policies <br />generally affectiiig their application and <br />implementation. su(;h 'as'mi~n8 zones, <br />low flows and variances. Suoh policies <br />are subject to EPA review and approval. <br /> <br />Subp'art C-ProCediJre$ for;Revlew ' <br />, and Revision Of Water Quality <br />Standards <br /> <br />~ 131.20 Slate revlsw and revisiOn 01 <br />water quanty atandards. <br /> <br />(a) State Review: The State shall from <br />time to time; but at least once every <br />three years, hold public hearings for the <br />purpose of reviewing applicable water <br />quality standards and, as appropriate, <br />modifying and adopting stan~ards. Any <br />water body segment with water quality <br />standards that do not include the uses <br />spetlfied in Section 101[a)(2]l,f the Act <br />ahall be re-examined every three years <br />to determine if any new info~ation has <br />become available. If such neW <br />Information indicates that the uses <br />specified in Section '101(a)(2) (jf the Act ' <br />are attainable, the State shall revise it. <br /> <br />';1- <br /> <br />,~; <br /> <br />,f <br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />';1 <br /> <br /> <br />~~ <br />