Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ocl027 <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />". Results of Study No. 1. (Cont.) ..~._.."""""_,......~,....~........~.....".",..,...... <br />J - ....,..-" /' J '''--'-..~ <br /> <br />If ,Ce.ddo~ .. re~~~oi~'~~:"t~~Ark~~lis ri v~~ ~ld:~be ~ ope..~.~: in <br />the manner presoribed for Study No.1. uses, of water would ohange <br /> <br />approximately as shown in the table of oomparative data below. Changes in <br /> <br />the use of water in Colorado are summarized as the sum of ohanges above and <br /> <br />below the reservoir. Changes In flow' at the State line are oonsidered in <br /> <br />tYlO ways, <br /> <br />(l) The so-oalled usable stateline flow of Study No.1 <br /> <br />may be compared with a usable flow oomputed from historio <br /> <br />reoords. as in columns 1. 2 ~~d 3 of the table. Historio <br /> <br />usable 81Ilounts are oomputed aooording to oertain, <br /> <br />assumptions of divertibility and usability of stateline <br /> <br />flows (see Table 27) and is somewhat greater than the; <br /> <br />aotual used amounts, of stataline flow whioh may be oomputed <br /> <br />as; the differenoe bat~~en State line and Garden City <br /> <br />quanti ties. <br />{2} Usable flows of Study No.1 may be oompared with the <br /> <br />used amounts menti oned above. <br /> <br />In the first instanoe. the oonl]:arison a;Tlounts to an assumption that a <br /> <br />portion of the usable flows of Study No. 1 will not be used and that thia <br /> <br />portion is equivalent to the amounts of usable state11ne flow historically <br /> <br />unused. The seoond oasa assumes that all of the usable flow; of Stud;\' No.1 <br /> <br />will be used in Kansas. <br /> <br />...18.. <br /> <br />"",' <br /> <br />1.."". <br />