Laserfiche WebLink
<br />()J10~ <br /> <br />Study Procedure (Cont.) <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />b. Surfaoe areas from the initial capaoity table <br /> <br />(No. 14), corresponding to total volume of water <br /> <br />plus; silt were oonsidered to be the water' consuming <br /> <br />areas of the reservoir at tho end of eaoh month. <br /> <br />End of month areas were average.{for each two <br /> <br />o. <br /> <br />oonseoutive months and the resulting mean area was. <br /> <br />'.-........... <br /> <br />multiplied by the average net evaporation rate for the <br /> <br />1 Jlt <br /> <br />month (Table 19). <br /> <br />i' <br />i :.:, <br />',' ':-,; p <br /> <br />d. When no water was being held in storage no loss. was <br /> <br />oomputsd from'the silted area within the reservoir. <br /> <br />e. At times; when water was in. the reservoir for only <br /> <br />a part of a month evapo.transpiration charges ware <br /> <br />oalculated for the fraotional month. <br /> <br />Uses of. water'below Caddoa in Colorado and Kansas were made out <br /> <br />of. supplies at and below, Caddoa, in the following manner: <br />(1) Where pOSSible, all uses were supplied from,usable <br /> <br />aooretions~ (generally in winter when diversions were <br /> <br />assumed to be entirely below'Lamar). <br />(2) Where usable accretions below' Caddoa exoeeded, the total, <br /> <br />ideal demand, Colorado ditohes reoeived their' ideal <br /> <br />demand and the balanoe orossed the State line as usable <br /> <br />supply. <br /> <br />(3) Where usable accretions below Caddoa were less than ideal <br /> <br />demand, <br /> <br />",l~ <br /> <br />t-" <br /> <br />'k_ <br />