Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> 6 <br /> 4 <br />w 2 <br />::l <br />...J <br />;; 0 <br />X <br />W <br />C <br />Z -2 <br /> -4 <br /> -6 <br /> In In In In In In In In In In In N <br /> cr> 0 N '" V In <0 "- <Xl cr> 0 <br /> <Xl cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> 0 <br /> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N <br /> <br />Figure 3. Palmer Drought Severity Index for Utah, 1895-2002. <br /> <br />inches on the Great Salt lake Desert to about <br />60 inches in the highest mountains (Butler and <br />MarscH, 1972). Three types of moisture- <br />producing weather systems generally account <br />for most precipitation in Utah: Pacific frontal <br />systems, dissipating tropical storms, and summer <br /> <br />thunderstorms with moisture originating from <br />the Gulf of Mexico. <br />Pacific frontal storms generally produce <br />winter mountain snowpack. and the subsequent <br />spring snowmelt increases river flows and <br />reservoir levels. During some winters, high. <br /> <br />pressure ridges can dominate over the Western <br />United States and push storm systems northward. <br />These persistent high-pressure ridges result in <br />decreased snowfall in Utah mountain ranges <br />(U.S. Geological Survey, 199t). Mountain <br />snowpacks have generally been below normal <br />statewide since the wimer of 1998.99, and Utah <br />has experienced significant reductions in spring <br />runoff since 2000, <br />Many Federal and State government <br />agencies use the Palmer Drought Severiry Index <br />(PDSI) to classify and assess long-term <br />meteorological droughts (Hayes, 2002). The <br />PDSI drought index responds to abnonnally wet <br />or dry weather conditions and classifies the <br />conditions on a scale from -6 to 6. On this scale, <br />-4.0 or less signifies extreme drought conditions <br />and 4.0 or more signifies extremely wet <br />conditioIls_ Summarized data from the Utah <br />State University Climate Center in Logan, Utah <br />(Donald Jensen. written commun.. 2002), <br />illustrates the variable nature of precipitation in <br />Utah (fig. 3). On the basis of the PDSI <br />classification scale, the droughts of 1988-93 and <br />1999-2002 are severe to extreme. but conditions <br />are not as dry as those during 1896- t 905 (fig. <br />3). <br /> <br />Table 1. Chronology of major and other memorable floods and droughts in Utah, 1884.2002 <br /> <br />- <br /> . . . <br />. Aood <br />.. Drought - <br />. Aood <br />I. Drought <br />. Flood <br />. Drought <br />. Flo(xJ <br />. Flood <br />. Flood <br />. Flo(xJ <br />. F-lood <br />. Fhxxl <br />. Drought <br />. Flood <br /> <br /> <br />. Flood <br /> <br /> <br />. Flood <br /> <br />. Flood <br /> <br /> <br />. !-l,x>d <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />Area affected <br /> <br />July 4, 1884 Colorado River <br />1896.1907........ - - -Statewkle-- - <br /> <br />Aug. 13, 1923 <br /> <br />1930-36 <br /> <br />Apr. 28-Junc II. 1952 <br /> <br />1953-65 <br /> <br />June 16, 1963 <br /> <br />June fO-II, f965 <br /> <br />Dec. 6-7, t966 <br /> <br />Aug. 1-2.1968 <br /> <br />Sept. 5-7, 1970 <br /> <br />Aug. 27. 1972 <br />1974-78 <br /> <br />Apr. IO-June 25. 1983 <br /> <br />Apr. 17-June 20. 1984 <br /> <br />May 22, 1984 <br /> <br />June 15. 1984 <br /> <br />June 3, 1986 <br /> <br />. Flood June 7, 1986 <br />. Drought 1988-93 <br /> - -- - <br />. F10txJ Jan. I. 1989 <br />. FI()(xJ Feb..Mar. 1995 <br />. Flood May 1997 <br />. Drought 1 999-presem <br /> <br /> <br /> 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1960 1990 2000 <br /> 12,000 350 <br /> A~" <br /> 10,000 300 .- <br /> . <br /> 8,000 250 <br /> 6,000 200 <br /> 150 <br /> 4,000 100 <br /> 2,000 50 <br />I- 0 0 <br />W <br />W <br />U. 200 250 <br />iii 175 Whiterocks River near Whiterocks. UT Smith'S Fork near Border. WY <br />cr 150 1930-2002 IMlrage annual 200 1943-2O(l2avurllg611nnual <br />0 Slrellm!low139,500lIer&-1oo1 <br />-0: 125 slreamllow 81,900 acre-leet <br /> 150 <br />U. 100 <br />0 15 100 A~" <br />m M..... <br />e 50 50 $tr&llmJlow <br />Z 25 <br />-0: <br />m 0 0 <br />:::> <br />0 10.000 350 <br />J: 300 <br />I- 8,000 <br />~ 250 <br />s: 6.000 200 <br />0 4,000 150 <br />..J <br />U. 100 <br />::E 2.000 50 <br />-0: <br />w 0 0 <br />cr <br />I- 5.000 100 <br />m <br /> 4,000 15 <br /> 3,000 <br /> 50 <br /> 2,000 <br /> 1.000 25 <br /> 0 0 <br /> 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 '960 1970 1980 1990 2000 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 4. Relation of annual streamflow to average annual streamflow for the periOd of record. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />---- <br /> <br />Tributaries 10 Great Salt Lake between Ogden and Sail <br />Lake City <br /> <br />--- <br />Statewide <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Strawberry. upper Price, upper San Rafael. Ogden. Weber, <br />Provo. and Jordan Rivers; Blacksmith and Spanish Fork; <br />upper Muddy and Chalk Creeks <br /> <br />Statewide <br /> <br />Duchesne River <br /> <br />Ashley Cn."('k and ocher streams Oetween Manila and <br />Vernal. and west of Manila <br /> <br />Virgin and Santa Clara Rivers <br /> <br />Cottonwood Wash and other nearby tributaries to San <br />Juan River <br /> <br />San Juan River and tributaries from McElmo Creek to <br />Chinle Creek <br /> <br />Vernon Creek <br /> <br />Statewide <br /> <br />Lower Duchesne and Jordan Rivers and tributaries <br />(including Spanish Fork); upper Price. Bear. Sevier, and <br />San Pitch Rivers; Chalk. Easl Canyon. Trout. and George <br />Creeks; Great Salt Lake and tributaries belween Ogden <br />and Salt Lake CilY <br /> <br />White, upper Price. and Fremont Rivers: lower Bear and <br />Sevier Rivers and tributaries: Beaver River; Red Butte <br />Creek; Spanish Fork; Jordan River <br /> <br />Sevier Lake <br /> <br />Ut.ah Lake <br /> <br />Great Salt Lake <br /> <br />Provo River <br /> <br />Stalewide <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Quail Creek, lower Virgin River <br /> <br />- -- <br />Santa Clara River <br /> <br />Soulh Fork Ogden River. Logan River. Blacksmith's <br />Fork <br /> <br />Statewide <br /> <br />Streamflow <br /> <br />Remarks <br /> <br />Data from eight long-term streamflow- <br />gaging stations maintained by the USGS Utah <br />District were used to assess historic and current <br />drought conditions. The stations (fig. I) were <br />selected from a network of more than 150 stations <br />in Utah and are considered index sites because <br />they generally reflect streamflow conditions in <br />their local area. Major darns have regulated <br />flow on the Colorado, Green, and San Juan <br />Rivers upstream from the index sites since the <br />early I 960s. The Beaver, Virgin, and Weber <br />Rivers arc lightly regulated by small headwater <br />reservoirs or power genemting facilities. Smith's <br />Fork and the Whitcrocks River have small <br />diversions in upper watershed areas but are not <br />regulated upstream from the gages. Despite <br />these modifications to the drainages, these index <br />sites are considered to generally reflect <br />hydrologic conditions in their respective <br />watersheds, including snowpack and the amount <br />of water stored in reservoirs. <br /> <br />Probably snowmelt combined with rainfall. <br /> <br />Reg~;1. <br />Locally intense thunderstorms. Deaths, 7; damage. <br />$ 300,000. <br /> <br />Regional. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Melling of snowpack having maximum-of-record water <br />content for Apr. I. Disaster declared. Deaths. 2; damage, <br />$8.4 million. <br /> <br />Regional. <br /> <br />Dam failure. <br /> <br />Three days of inlense rainfall on rhick snowpack above <br />altitude of 9,200 feet. Deaths, 7; damage. $814.000. <br /> <br />Four days of light to intense rainfall of as much as 12 <br />inches. Damage, $1.4 million. <br /> <br />Locally inten5e thunderstorms tollowing II days of rainfall. <br />Damage. .$34.000. <br /> <br />Historic Streamflow Data <br /> <br />Record-breaking rainfall. Deaths. 2; damage. $700.000. <br /> <br />Locally intense Ihunderstorms, <br /> <br />A chronology of significant flood5 and <br />droughts in Utah from 1884 to 2002 and a <br />summary of their eITects on infrastructure, <br />population, and the environment is presented in <br />table I. Prior to current drought conditions. <br />Utah experienced drought on a regional scale <br />most recently in the late I 980s to early 1990s. <br />Other major droughts occurred during 1896. <br />t 905. 1930-36, 1953-65, and 1974-78. The <br />average length of these droughts is about 5 years <br />and they recur about every 10 to 20 years. <br />A hydrologic drought is defined as "a period <br />of below average watcr content in streams, <br />reservoirs, ground-water aquifers, lakes and <br />soils" (Yevjevich and others, 1977). The relation <br />of annual streamflow to average annllal <br />streamflow for the period ofrccord for the eight <br />index sites (tig. 4) shows the cyclical nature of <br />wet and dry conditions in Utah. <br /> <br />Regional. <br /> <br />Rapid melting of snowpack having ma:\imum.of-record <br />water content for June I. Result of large El Nino event. <br />Disaslerdeclared by President. Damage, $621 million. <br /> <br />Runoff from greater-than-average snowpack for Apr. I <br />and spring precipitation. Result of large EI Nino event. <br /> <br />Runoff in Sevier River from Nov. 1982 through June 1984 <br />exceeded upstream reservoir c.lpacity~ about 1.5 million <br />acre~feet of water conveyed to Sevier Lake. On May 22. <br />1984. lake reported to be as deep as 35 feet deep after <br />being dry or nearly dry since about 1880. <br /> <br />Runoff from greater-than-normal precipitation since Sept. <br />1982 increased lake level to 10 I-year record of 5.46 feet <br />above compromise level on June 15. 1984. Mainly a resull <br />of large EI Nino event of 1983-84. Damage. $5.9 million. <br /> <br />- <br />High runoff from greater.than-normal precipitalion since <br />Sepl.. 1982 increa<>ed lake level to 140-yenr reconl altitude <br />of 4.211.85 feci on June 3, 1986. Partially a result of large <br />EI Nino event of 1983-84. Damage. $268 million. <br /> <br />101111998 4/111999 1011/1999 41112000 101112000 4/112001 101112001 4/112002 101112002 <br /> <br />100,000 <br /> <br />Colorado River near Cisco. UT <br /> <br />e <br />z <br />o <br />o <br />w <br />m <br />cr <br />w <br />0- <br />I- <br />W <br />W <br />U. <br />o <br />iii <br />:::> <br />o <br />~ <br />s: <br />o <br />..J <br />U. <br />::E <br />-0: <br />w <br />cr <br />I- <br />m <br /> <br />10.000 <br /> <br /> <br />1,000 <br /> <br />100.000 <br /> <br />Green River near Green River. UT <br /> <br />10,000 <br /> <br /> <br />1,000 <br /> <br />100.000 <br /> <br />San Juan River near Bluff, UT <br /> <br />10,000 <br /> <br /> <br />1.000 <br /> <br />1011/1998 4/1/1999 1011/1999 4/112000 101112000 41112001 101112001 4/112002 101112002 <br /> <br />EXPLANATION <br /> <br />- Average daily mean streamflow <br />- Dally mean streamllow <br /> <br />Figure 5. Relation of daily mean streamflow for water years 1999-2002 <br />to mean streamflow for period of record, <br /> <br />Current Streamflow Data <br /> <br />2. In 1999, streamflow was near or below average <br />for the Colorado River, Beaver River, and Virgin <br />River. These streamflow-gaging stations are all <br />located in southern Utah. By 2000, an of the <br />index sites indicated below.average flow. This <br />trend has continued through 2002 with the <br />exception of the Whiterocks River, which had <br />slightly higher-than-average flow in 200 I. The <br />Whiterocks River nows down the southern slope <br />of the Uinta Mountains in northeastern Utah <br />(fig. I). This area accumulated average <br />snowpack during the winter or2001 (Natural <br />Resources Conservation Service, 2002); <br />however, on average, the larger Green River <br />basin accumulated a substantially lower.than. <br />average snowpack for (he same period as <br /> <br />The end.of-season snowpack, as measured <br />by the Natural Resources Conservation Service <br />SNOTEL system on April I, 2002. was below <br />average statewide, The snowpack, and therefore <br />the relative amount of water available for runoff, <br />was about 78 percent of average in northern <br />Utah drainages and ranged from 24 percent to <br />54 percent of average in the southern part of the <br />State. In eastern and southeastern Utah, the end. <br />of-season snowpack was the lowest since 1977 <br />and 1999 (Natural Resources Conservation <br />Service, 2002). <br />The percentage of average flow for the <br />eight index sites for 1999-2002 is show" in table <br /> <br />Table 2. Annual streamflow data for eight long-term streamflow-gaging stations <br />[kac-ft, thousands of acre-feet) <br /> <br />Trial Lake dam failure. Slope-area meusuremenl. <br />II, - -- <br />II RegIOnal. <br /> <br />Quail Creek Reservoir dike failed on Jan. I. 1989, releasing <br />aboUI 25.000 acre-feel of waler 10 [he Virgin River near <br />Hurricane. Damage. $12 million. <br /> <br />Average 1999 I 2000 2001 2002 <br />tolal ~ Rank of <br />annual lowest <br />!low lor Total Total Total Total lotal <br />Station Name Penod 01 period 01 annual Percenl annual Percent annual Percent annual Percent annual <br />record record Itow 01 !low 01 flow 01 flow 01 !low <br />(kac-h) (kae.'I) average (kac-ft) average (kac-ft) average (kac-ft) average 2002 <br /> <br />Colorado River near Cisco, UT 1914-2002 5,297 4,807 90 3,856 72 3,003 56 1.856 35 I <br />- - <br />Whiterocks River near Whiterocks. UT 1930-2002 82 116 140 62 75 87 106 33 40 2 <br />Green River near Green River. UT 1906.2002 4,463 5,392 1211 3.206 71 2.464 55 1,591 36 2 <br />San Juan River near Bluff. UT 1916.1928. 1930-21102 1,638 1.837 III 838 51 1161 70 538 33 I <br />Virgin River near Virgin, UT 1910-2002 1,4-1 102 70 90 62 100 69 61 43 I <br />Smiths Fork near Border, wy 1943-2002 139 179 127 107 76 72 51 74 53 4 <br />Weber River near Oakley. UT 1905-2002 158 184 116 II~J 69 1110 63 93 59 8 <br />Beaver River near Beaver. UT 1915-2002 38 37 97 25 65 29 77 16 -II 3 <br /> \\f~ ? \=::'OCj 0 IS <br /> <br />GreateNhaa.noffi1al snowp<ld,: in lhe Bear and Weber <br />River drainage basins caused minor 1100xJing. Minor <br />damage occurred to cabins and campgrounds in the area. <br /> <br />Regional. <br />