<br />
<br /> 6
<br /> 4
<br />w 2
<br />::l
<br />...J
<br />;; 0
<br />X
<br />W
<br />C
<br />Z -2
<br /> -4
<br /> -6
<br /> In In In In In In In In In In In N
<br /> cr> 0 N '" V In <0 "- <Xl cr> 0
<br /> <Xl cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> cr> 0
<br /> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
<br />
<br />Figure 3. Palmer Drought Severity Index for Utah, 1895-2002.
<br />
<br />inches on the Great Salt lake Desert to about
<br />60 inches in the highest mountains (Butler and
<br />MarscH, 1972). Three types of moisture-
<br />producing weather systems generally account
<br />for most precipitation in Utah: Pacific frontal
<br />systems, dissipating tropical storms, and summer
<br />
<br />thunderstorms with moisture originating from
<br />the Gulf of Mexico.
<br />Pacific frontal storms generally produce
<br />winter mountain snowpack. and the subsequent
<br />spring snowmelt increases river flows and
<br />reservoir levels. During some winters, high.
<br />
<br />pressure ridges can dominate over the Western
<br />United States and push storm systems northward.
<br />These persistent high-pressure ridges result in
<br />decreased snowfall in Utah mountain ranges
<br />(U.S. Geological Survey, 199t). Mountain
<br />snowpacks have generally been below normal
<br />statewide since the wimer of 1998.99, and Utah
<br />has experienced significant reductions in spring
<br />runoff since 2000,
<br />Many Federal and State government
<br />agencies use the Palmer Drought Severiry Index
<br />(PDSI) to classify and assess long-term
<br />meteorological droughts (Hayes, 2002). The
<br />PDSI drought index responds to abnonnally wet
<br />or dry weather conditions and classifies the
<br />conditions on a scale from -6 to 6. On this scale,
<br />-4.0 or less signifies extreme drought conditions
<br />and 4.0 or more signifies extremely wet
<br />conditioIls_ Summarized data from the Utah
<br />State University Climate Center in Logan, Utah
<br />(Donald Jensen. written commun.. 2002),
<br />illustrates the variable nature of precipitation in
<br />Utah (fig. 3). On the basis of the PDSI
<br />classification scale, the droughts of 1988-93 and
<br />1999-2002 are severe to extreme. but conditions
<br />are not as dry as those during 1896- t 905 (fig.
<br />3).
<br />
<br />Table 1. Chronology of major and other memorable floods and droughts in Utah, 1884.2002
<br />
<br />-
<br /> . . .
<br />. Aood
<br />.. Drought -
<br />. Aood
<br />I. Drought
<br />. Flood
<br />. Drought
<br />. Flo(xJ
<br />. Flood
<br />. Flood
<br />. Flo(xJ
<br />. F-lood
<br />. Fhxxl
<br />. Drought
<br />. Flood
<br />
<br />
<br />. Flood
<br />
<br />
<br />. Flood
<br />
<br />. Flood
<br />
<br />
<br />. !-l,x>d
<br />
<br />Date
<br />
<br />Area affected
<br />
<br />July 4, 1884 Colorado River
<br />1896.1907........ - - -Statewkle-- -
<br />
<br />Aug. 13, 1923
<br />
<br />1930-36
<br />
<br />Apr. 28-Junc II. 1952
<br />
<br />1953-65
<br />
<br />June 16, 1963
<br />
<br />June fO-II, f965
<br />
<br />Dec. 6-7, t966
<br />
<br />Aug. 1-2.1968
<br />
<br />Sept. 5-7, 1970
<br />
<br />Aug. 27. 1972
<br />1974-78
<br />
<br />Apr. IO-June 25. 1983
<br />
<br />Apr. 17-June 20. 1984
<br />
<br />May 22, 1984
<br />
<br />June 15. 1984
<br />
<br />June 3, 1986
<br />
<br />. Flood June 7, 1986
<br />. Drought 1988-93
<br /> - -- -
<br />. F10txJ Jan. I. 1989
<br />. FI()(xJ Feb..Mar. 1995
<br />. Flood May 1997
<br />. Drought 1 999-presem
<br />
<br />
<br /> 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1960 1990 2000
<br /> 12,000 350
<br /> A~"
<br /> 10,000 300 .-
<br /> .
<br /> 8,000 250
<br /> 6,000 200
<br /> 150
<br /> 4,000 100
<br /> 2,000 50
<br />I- 0 0
<br />W
<br />W
<br />U. 200 250
<br />iii 175 Whiterocks River near Whiterocks. UT Smith'S Fork near Border. WY
<br />cr 150 1930-2002 IMlrage annual 200 1943-2O(l2avurllg611nnual
<br />0 Slrellm!low139,500lIer&-1oo1
<br />-0: 125 slreamllow 81,900 acre-leet
<br /> 150
<br />U. 100
<br />0 15 100 A~"
<br />m M.....
<br />e 50 50 $tr&llmJlow
<br />Z 25
<br />-0:
<br />m 0 0
<br />:::>
<br />0 10.000 350
<br />J: 300
<br />I- 8,000
<br />~ 250
<br />s: 6.000 200
<br />0 4,000 150
<br />..J
<br />U. 100
<br />::E 2.000 50
<br />-0:
<br />w 0 0
<br />cr
<br />I- 5.000 100
<br />m
<br /> 4,000 15
<br /> 3,000
<br /> 50
<br /> 2,000
<br /> 1.000 25
<br /> 0 0
<br /> 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 '960 1970 1980 1990 2000
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Figure 4. Relation of annual streamflow to average annual streamflow for the periOd of record.
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />----
<br />
<br />Tributaries 10 Great Salt Lake between Ogden and Sail
<br />Lake City
<br />
<br />---
<br />Statewide
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />Strawberry. upper Price, upper San Rafael. Ogden. Weber,
<br />Provo. and Jordan Rivers; Blacksmith and Spanish Fork;
<br />upper Muddy and Chalk Creeks
<br />
<br />Statewide
<br />
<br />Duchesne River
<br />
<br />Ashley Cn."('k and ocher streams Oetween Manila and
<br />Vernal. and west of Manila
<br />
<br />Virgin and Santa Clara Rivers
<br />
<br />Cottonwood Wash and other nearby tributaries to San
<br />Juan River
<br />
<br />San Juan River and tributaries from McElmo Creek to
<br />Chinle Creek
<br />
<br />Vernon Creek
<br />
<br />Statewide
<br />
<br />Lower Duchesne and Jordan Rivers and tributaries
<br />(including Spanish Fork); upper Price. Bear. Sevier, and
<br />San Pitch Rivers; Chalk. Easl Canyon. Trout. and George
<br />Creeks; Great Salt Lake and tributaries belween Ogden
<br />and Salt Lake CilY
<br />
<br />White, upper Price. and Fremont Rivers: lower Bear and
<br />Sevier Rivers and tributaries: Beaver River; Red Butte
<br />Creek; Spanish Fork; Jordan River
<br />
<br />Sevier Lake
<br />
<br />Ut.ah Lake
<br />
<br />Great Salt Lake
<br />
<br />Provo River
<br />
<br />Stalewide
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />Quail Creek, lower Virgin River
<br />
<br />- --
<br />Santa Clara River
<br />
<br />Soulh Fork Ogden River. Logan River. Blacksmith's
<br />Fork
<br />
<br />Statewide
<br />
<br />Streamflow
<br />
<br />Remarks
<br />
<br />Data from eight long-term streamflow-
<br />gaging stations maintained by the USGS Utah
<br />District were used to assess historic and current
<br />drought conditions. The stations (fig. I) were
<br />selected from a network of more than 150 stations
<br />in Utah and are considered index sites because
<br />they generally reflect streamflow conditions in
<br />their local area. Major darns have regulated
<br />flow on the Colorado, Green, and San Juan
<br />Rivers upstream from the index sites since the
<br />early I 960s. The Beaver, Virgin, and Weber
<br />Rivers arc lightly regulated by small headwater
<br />reservoirs or power genemting facilities. Smith's
<br />Fork and the Whitcrocks River have small
<br />diversions in upper watershed areas but are not
<br />regulated upstream from the gages. Despite
<br />these modifications to the drainages, these index
<br />sites are considered to generally reflect
<br />hydrologic conditions in their respective
<br />watersheds, including snowpack and the amount
<br />of water stored in reservoirs.
<br />
<br />Probably snowmelt combined with rainfall.
<br />
<br />Reg~;1.
<br />Locally intense thunderstorms. Deaths, 7; damage.
<br />$ 300,000.
<br />
<br />Regional.
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />Melling of snowpack having maximum-of-record water
<br />content for Apr. I. Disaster declared. Deaths. 2; damage,
<br />$8.4 million.
<br />
<br />Regional.
<br />
<br />Dam failure.
<br />
<br />Three days of inlense rainfall on rhick snowpack above
<br />altitude of 9,200 feet. Deaths, 7; damage. $814.000.
<br />
<br />Four days of light to intense rainfall of as much as 12
<br />inches. Damage, $1.4 million.
<br />
<br />Locally inten5e thunderstorms tollowing II days of rainfall.
<br />Damage. .$34.000.
<br />
<br />Historic Streamflow Data
<br />
<br />Record-breaking rainfall. Deaths. 2; damage. $700.000.
<br />
<br />Locally intense Ihunderstorms,
<br />
<br />A chronology of significant flood5 and
<br />droughts in Utah from 1884 to 2002 and a
<br />summary of their eITects on infrastructure,
<br />population, and the environment is presented in
<br />table I. Prior to current drought conditions.
<br />Utah experienced drought on a regional scale
<br />most recently in the late I 980s to early 1990s.
<br />Other major droughts occurred during 1896.
<br />t 905. 1930-36, 1953-65, and 1974-78. The
<br />average length of these droughts is about 5 years
<br />and they recur about every 10 to 20 years.
<br />A hydrologic drought is defined as "a period
<br />of below average watcr content in streams,
<br />reservoirs, ground-water aquifers, lakes and
<br />soils" (Yevjevich and others, 1977). The relation
<br />of annual streamflow to average annllal
<br />streamflow for the period ofrccord for the eight
<br />index sites (tig. 4) shows the cyclical nature of
<br />wet and dry conditions in Utah.
<br />
<br />Regional.
<br />
<br />Rapid melting of snowpack having ma:\imum.of-record
<br />water content for June I. Result of large El Nino event.
<br />Disaslerdeclared by President. Damage, $621 million.
<br />
<br />Runoff from greater-than-average snowpack for Apr. I
<br />and spring precipitation. Result of large EI Nino event.
<br />
<br />Runoff in Sevier River from Nov. 1982 through June 1984
<br />exceeded upstream reservoir c.lpacity~ about 1.5 million
<br />acre~feet of water conveyed to Sevier Lake. On May 22.
<br />1984. lake reported to be as deep as 35 feet deep after
<br />being dry or nearly dry since about 1880.
<br />
<br />Runoff from greater-than-normal precipitation since Sept.
<br />1982 increased lake level to 10 I-year record of 5.46 feet
<br />above compromise level on June 15. 1984. Mainly a resull
<br />of large EI Nino event of 1983-84. Damage. $5.9 million.
<br />
<br />-
<br />High runoff from greater.than-normal precipitalion since
<br />Sepl.. 1982 increa<>ed lake level to 140-yenr reconl altitude
<br />of 4.211.85 feci on June 3, 1986. Partially a result of large
<br />EI Nino event of 1983-84. Damage. $268 million.
<br />
<br />101111998 4/111999 1011/1999 41112000 101112000 4/112001 101112001 4/112002 101112002
<br />
<br />100,000
<br />
<br />Colorado River near Cisco. UT
<br />
<br />e
<br />z
<br />o
<br />o
<br />w
<br />m
<br />cr
<br />w
<br />0-
<br />I-
<br />W
<br />W
<br />U.
<br />o
<br />iii
<br />:::>
<br />o
<br />~
<br />s:
<br />o
<br />..J
<br />U.
<br />::E
<br />-0:
<br />w
<br />cr
<br />I-
<br />m
<br />
<br />10.000
<br />
<br />
<br />1,000
<br />
<br />100.000
<br />
<br />Green River near Green River. UT
<br />
<br />10,000
<br />
<br />
<br />1,000
<br />
<br />100.000
<br />
<br />San Juan River near Bluff, UT
<br />
<br />10,000
<br />
<br />
<br />1.000
<br />
<br />1011/1998 4/1/1999 1011/1999 4/112000 101112000 41112001 101112001 4/112002 101112002
<br />
<br />EXPLANATION
<br />
<br />- Average daily mean streamflow
<br />- Dally mean streamllow
<br />
<br />Figure 5. Relation of daily mean streamflow for water years 1999-2002
<br />to mean streamflow for period of record,
<br />
<br />Current Streamflow Data
<br />
<br />2. In 1999, streamflow was near or below average
<br />for the Colorado River, Beaver River, and Virgin
<br />River. These streamflow-gaging stations are all
<br />located in southern Utah. By 2000, an of the
<br />index sites indicated below.average flow. This
<br />trend has continued through 2002 with the
<br />exception of the Whiterocks River, which had
<br />slightly higher-than-average flow in 200 I. The
<br />Whiterocks River nows down the southern slope
<br />of the Uinta Mountains in northeastern Utah
<br />(fig. I). This area accumulated average
<br />snowpack during the winter or2001 (Natural
<br />Resources Conservation Service, 2002);
<br />however, on average, the larger Green River
<br />basin accumulated a substantially lower.than.
<br />average snowpack for (he same period as
<br />
<br />The end.of-season snowpack, as measured
<br />by the Natural Resources Conservation Service
<br />SNOTEL system on April I, 2002. was below
<br />average statewide, The snowpack, and therefore
<br />the relative amount of water available for runoff,
<br />was about 78 percent of average in northern
<br />Utah drainages and ranged from 24 percent to
<br />54 percent of average in the southern part of the
<br />State. In eastern and southeastern Utah, the end.
<br />of-season snowpack was the lowest since 1977
<br />and 1999 (Natural Resources Conservation
<br />Service, 2002).
<br />The percentage of average flow for the
<br />eight index sites for 1999-2002 is show" in table
<br />
<br />Table 2. Annual streamflow data for eight long-term streamflow-gaging stations
<br />[kac-ft, thousands of acre-feet)
<br />
<br />Trial Lake dam failure. Slope-area meusuremenl.
<br />II, - --
<br />II RegIOnal.
<br />
<br />Quail Creek Reservoir dike failed on Jan. I. 1989, releasing
<br />aboUI 25.000 acre-feel of waler 10 [he Virgin River near
<br />Hurricane. Damage. $12 million.
<br />
<br />Average 1999 I 2000 2001 2002
<br />tolal ~ Rank of
<br />annual lowest
<br />!low lor Total Total Total Total lotal
<br />Station Name Penod 01 period 01 annual Percenl annual Percent annual Percent annual Percent annual
<br />record record Itow 01 !low 01 flow 01 flow 01 !low
<br />(kac-h) (kae.'I) average (kac-ft) average (kac-ft) average (kac-ft) average 2002
<br />
<br />Colorado River near Cisco, UT 1914-2002 5,297 4,807 90 3,856 72 3,003 56 1.856 35 I
<br />- -
<br />Whiterocks River near Whiterocks. UT 1930-2002 82 116 140 62 75 87 106 33 40 2
<br />Green River near Green River. UT 1906.2002 4,463 5,392 1211 3.206 71 2.464 55 1,591 36 2
<br />San Juan River near Bluff. UT 1916.1928. 1930-21102 1,638 1.837 III 838 51 1161 70 538 33 I
<br />Virgin River near Virgin, UT 1910-2002 1,4-1 102 70 90 62 100 69 61 43 I
<br />Smiths Fork near Border, wy 1943-2002 139 179 127 107 76 72 51 74 53 4
<br />Weber River near Oakley. UT 1905-2002 158 184 116 II~J 69 1110 63 93 59 8
<br />Beaver River near Beaver. UT 1915-2002 38 37 97 25 65 29 77 16 -II 3
<br /> \\f~ ? \=::'OCj 0 IS
<br />
<br />GreateNhaa.noffi1al snowp<ld,: in lhe Bear and Weber
<br />River drainage basins caused minor 1100xJing. Minor
<br />damage occurred to cabins and campgrounds in the area.
<br />
<br />Regional.
<br />
|