Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t"- <br />oo <br />e: <br />,.., e- J <br />c: <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />,; <br /> <br />.; <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />o <br />u <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />exceeding the average annual supply, The amount of water that <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />can be carried over into the post-1985 period when the CAP, <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Central Arizona Project, is to begin operation will be limited <br /> <br />4 by the amount of storage space that must be reserved for flood <br /> <br />5 con tr 01 purposes. <br /> <br />6 If a lesser amount of flood control storage space <br /> <br />7 than the present 5,35 million acre-foot were to be required, <br /> <br />8 a correspondingly greater amount of water could be stored for <br /> <br />9 later use. Since the cost of alternative water supplies avail <br /> <br />10 able to the Metropolitan Water District at the present time <br /> <br />11 is about $150 per acre-foot. And this alternative water suppl <br /> <br />12 is our water supply from the State Water Project, and this <br /> <br />13 data $150 per acre-foot represents the cost that is given by <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />the Department of Water Resources to us, or for alternative <br /> <br />15 waters fr an that source. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />This $15D per acre-foot, would mean that each <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />acre-feet of reservoir capacity, which is now reserved for fl <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />control regulation purposes, could result in a loss of water <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />worth a hundred and fifty million dollars, and this is as far <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />as the Metropolitan Water District is concerned. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />The effects of lesser amounts of storage space bein <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />reserved for flood cmtrol purposes can be offset by increase <br /> <br />23 in downstream channel capacity. Such increases in channel <br /> <br />24 capacity would not only reduce damages due to high river flows <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />during flood events, but would also permit <br /> <br />.... .,pid .......'1. <br /> <br />, , <br />