Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.(:) <br />\~J <br />C..;l <br />("\) <br /> <br />OJ <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />stocked into the mainstream via canals or overflow during <br />flooding. Colorado squawfish, humpback chub, and bony tail <br />chub could also be considered for stocking in these "O-lO <br />ponds," In ponds where the landowner is not interested in <br />salmonids, only native fishes should be stocked. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />In the "lO-50 ponds," consider stocking subadult or adult <br />razorback sucker in conjunction with largemouth bass, <br />bluegill, and black crappie. Razorback suckers may spawn in <br />these ponds and produce fry. Chances are low that any of <br />the fry will survive predation by the nonnative fishes, but <br />the few that may survive, or the adults themselves will have <br />the opportunity to migrate into the mainstream when the <br />river overflows those ponds every 10 to 50 years. predation <br />on stocked razorback suckers will improve growth of <br />largemouth bass, and some large razorback suckers will be <br />added to the mainstream at infrequent intervals. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />We are not especially worried about the infrequent input ot <br />game fishes from the "10-50 ponds" during flooding, as thos" <br />species will apparently not establish self-sustaining <br />populations in the river, and thus numbers should be so low <br />as to not greatly impact the endangered fishes. However, in <br />those ponds have connecting channels to the river, those <br />channels must be screened to prevent migration. <br /> <br />7. Once a "0-10" pond or "10-50 pond" is breached by <br />floodwaters, there is a chance that undesirable fishes may <br />gain access and establish there. Once a pond has been <br />flooded, it then should be surveyed to make sure that <br />detrimental fishes have not been established. If they have, <br />the pond should be reclaimed. <br /> <br />8 . Colorado Department of Agriculture has suggested that. the <br />"10-50 ponds" under private ownership should be stocked with <br />fishes from private commercial aquaculture facilities. We <br />are concerned about incidental inclusion of unwanted fishes, <br />as we have always seen non-target fishes delivered to a <br />stocking site mixed in with purchased species, including <br />fishes like goldfish (Carassius auratus) and golden shiners <br />INotemigonus crysoleucas) that may not presently be <br />maintaining self-sustaining populations within the Colorado <br />River watershed. DOW should assure that the private ponds <br />managed for warmwater game fish are not contaminated with <br />unwanted species during stocking. This is not a concern in <br />the public ponds to be stocked by DOW, as we understand that <br />DOW hatcheries maintain pure stocks. <br /> <br />9, We are concerned about renovation, sampling, and stocking of <br />the "0-10 ponds" on private property. Of course the <br />elimination of any of these sources of unwanted fishes <br />benefits the native fishes, but if only a small portion of <br />