Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... ,. "fiR", .- ..~- <br /> <br />002484 <br /> <br />DeDletioo Accouotiol! <br /> <br />Water depletions are defined herein simply as diversions less return flows. Diversions include water <br />diverted from the river, as well as evaporation from reservoirs and other impoundments, such as <br />stock ponds. Depletions represent an annual reduction in the volume of stream flow that would have <br />reached the critical habitat of the endangered fishes. Normal water losses due to direct evaporation <br />from streams and rivers, transpiration by riparian vegetation, percolation to groundwater and bank <br />storage are not considered depletions, as these also are characteristic of unmodified river systems. <br /> <br />Current average annual depletions from the Yarnpa River in Colorado have been estimated using <br />the CRDSS to be about 125,000 AF/year, while comparable depletions from the Little Snake River <br />in Wyoming are estimated to be about 43,000 AF/year. Based 'upon projections of human water <br />demands, depletion increments of 30,000 AF/year in Colorado and 23,000 AF/year in Wyoming <br />were added to current depletions to account for anticipated water consumption circa 2045. <br />Ranges of annual depletions, if normally distributed, would exceed projected average annual <br />depletions of about 155,000 AF in Colorado and 66,000 AF in Wyoming in half of the years. <br /> <br />An environmental impact assessment (see ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT beginning on <br />page 108) considered the entire range of depletions represented by these annual averages, and <br />management actions described in this plan were designed to offset the impacts of these depletions <br />on the listed fishes. An intra-Service biological opinion pursuant to ESA Section 7 will be based <br />on the best information currently available; however, if any of the assumptions/information upon <br />which the opinion is based should change significantly in the future, it may be necessary for the <br />Service to reinitiate consultation and supplement or amend its opinion on the implementation of this <br />management plan. <br /> <br />For example, if average annual depletions reach or exceed the estimated depletions considered by <br />the Service in rendering its biological opinion (i.e., 155,000 AF/year in Colorado and 66,000 <br />AF/year in Wyoming), the Service would likely reinitiate consultation. Therefore, annual water <br />demand from the Yampa River Basin in Colorado and Wyoming will be quantified periodically, <br />and average annual depletions will be estimated following a process similar to that used to estimate <br />1998 and 2045 depletions. In Colorado, the USBR prepares a Consumptive Uses and Losses Report <br />(CULR) every 5 years, using information provided by the CWCB. Data from the CULR or State- <br />approved demand estimate will be backcast over the 90-year CROSS period of record for the Yampa <br />River to estimate annual depletions that would have occurred in each of the years of the hydrologic <br />record. Averaging depletions over this period would minimize the influence of exceptional years <br />and produce results more directly comparable to those projected future depletions that will be <br />considered in the consultation. <br /> <br />Every 5 years, beginning in 2005, the States of Colorado and Wyoming will report to the Recovery <br />Program estimated average annual volumes of depletions from the Yampa and Little Snake rivers <br />and their tributaries. When estimated average annual depletions reach 155,000 AF in Colorado or <br />66,000 AF in Wyoming, the Service is expected to reinitiate intra-Service consultation under ESA <br />Section 7, and, depending upon the outcome of that consultation, this plan and/or the cooperative <br />agreement with the Service to implement this plan may need to be modified or supplemented. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Management Plan for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin <br /> <br />30 <br />