My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03461
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03461
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:31 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:44:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.40.J
Description
Colorado River Basin Threatened-Endangered Species - UCRBRIP - Yampa River - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
9/1/2004
Author
USFWS
Title
Management Plan for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin - Volume I -Environmental Assessment - USFWS - 09-01-2004
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Base flows also are important for maintaining populations of the endangered fishes. Generally, rime <br />habitats are shallow, well oxygenated, free of fines, and highly productive in macroinvertebrate <br />biomass. Because they are shallow, rimes also are sensitive to changes in stream flow; Modde et <br />al. (1999) found that available rime habitat declined rapidly below 93 cfs. During lower flows, <br />larger fishes may abandon ephemeral shallows and retreat into deeper, more persistent, though less <br />productive, pools. Colorado pikeminnow are less mobile at this time (Modde et al. 1999); therefore, <br />their ability to pass through shallow rimes is not critical to their survival. However, higher summer <br />temperatures and overcrowding combined with a reductions in their food supply could affect their <br />viability. Adequate base flows also are needed to freshen pools and moderate temperatures. <br /> <br />The Little Snake River is the largest tributary to the Yampa both in terms of watershed area and <br />volume of discharge. The Little Snake River subbasin, including about 1,331 square miles (35%) <br />in Wyoming, encompasses roughly half of the total watershed area upstream from the Deerlodge <br />Park gage on the Yampa River. However, its average annual discharge at Lily Park is only 27% <br />(428,000 AF) of the average annual discharge ofthe Yampa River at Deerlodge Park. The Lily Park <br />gage is located on the Little Snake River 9 RM upstream from its confluence with the Yampa River, <br />or 14 RM upstream from the Deerlodge Park gage. Annual flow maxima at Lily Park have ranged <br />from a low of 865 cfs in 1934 to as much as 13,400 cfs in 1984, with a 76-year average peak of <br />4,607 cfs (1922-1997). During this period, flow maxima at Lily Park ranged from 20% to 57% of <br />their respective peak flows at Deerlodge Park 1 with an average of32%. The Little Snake River also <br />contributes a significant quantity of sediment, considered important for building and maintaining <br />spawning bars and nursery habitats for the endangered fishes in Yampa Canyon and the middle <br />Green River (Andrews 1978, 1986; Elliottetal. 1984; Muthetal. 2000; O'Brien 1987; USDI 1998). <br /> <br />( <br />( <br />/ <br />( <br />/ <br />( <br />( <br />( <br />( <br /> <br />Moreover, the Middle Green River, which extends from the confluence of the Yampa River <br />downstream to the confluence of the White River near Ouray, Utah, is ecologically inseparable from <br />the Lower Yampa in that the Green River not only benefits from the flows of the Yampa River, but <br />also benefits Yampa River populations of the endangered fishes by providing them important <br />nursery habitats from which fish are recruited as sub-adults into the Yampa River. <br /> <br />Flaming Gorge Dam, operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) primarily for irrigation <br />water supply and power generation since 1964, diminishes spring peak flows, while increasing base <br />flows during the remainder of the year. However, this plan is not intended to, nor will it, mitigate <br />the impacts of the dam on endangered fishes. Nevertheless, the Green River downstream from the <br />Yampa River is the product"Ofboth rivers (Figure 4). Therefore, for, the Middle Green River, this <br />plan recognizes the impacts of the dam, as well as the opporturuties it affords for flow management <br />in the Green River, both above and below the Yampa River. Water can be released from Flaming <br />Gorge to reinforce or extend the peak flow of the Green River below the Yampa confluence. By <br />increasing base flows, the dam can partially offset impacts to the Green River due to depletions from <br />the Yampa. However, the dam cannot mitigate depletion impacts to the Yampa River itself. <br />Moreover, re-operation of Flaming Gorge Dam to mitigate its impacts on the endangered fishes in <br />the Green River and support their recovery will be addressed in a separate biological opiruon and, <br />therefore, its re-operation is not part of this plan. <br /> <br />1 Comparison of annual flow maxima. Prior to 1982, daily flows at Deerlodge Park were <br />synthesized as the sum of gaged flows at Maybell and Lily Park. Flow maxima at Lily Park did <br />not necessarily occur on the same day as flow maxima at Deerlodge Park. <br /> <br />Management Plan for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.