|
<br />,j:.~~: ,;-7.' ;~~ ...:'L:.~,~ "
<br />002~31
<br />
<br />LIST OF TABLES (continued)
<br />
<br />Table 18. Stream-flow augmentation in AF/month as required by protocol .. , . . . . . . . . . . , .40
<br />
<br />Table 19. Stream-flow augmentation in days/month as required by protocol, . . . . . . . , , , . ' .41
<br />
<br />Table 20. Stream-flow augmentation water supply alternatives: Water source(s) and
<br />
<br />volume(s) . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , ' . . ' , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
<br />
<br />Table 21. Estimation of water conserved due to conversion from flood to sprinkler
<br />
<br />irrigation. . . . . . . ' . . . . , . . , . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ' , . , . , . . . . . . . . . . , . , 49
<br />
<br />Table 22. Comparison of the ability of stream-flow augmentation water supply
<br />alternatives to serve augmentation demand . . . . . , . . , . . . . ' , . , , ' , . . . . . . . . , , . . 52
<br />
<br />Table 23. Estimation of acreage required for supply interruption contrac!s ........",.." 53
<br />
<br />Table 24. Cost estimates for stream-flow augmentation water supply alternatives based
<br />on a range oflease and construction unit costs ........,.........'.....".,. 55
<br />
<br />Table 25. Frequency and magnitude of augmentation demand drawn from 13 structural
<br />water supply alternatives, by water source. . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . , . . . . . . . . , , , . 57
<br />
<br />Table 26. Comparison of potential impacts to agriculture due supply interruption
<br />
<br />contracts . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , ' . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , 66
<br />
<br />Table 27. Calculation of acreage taken out of irrigation to serve 1977 augmentation
<br />
<br />needs .......,....,..............,............,..,.,...........,." 67
<br />
<br />Table 28. Impacts of base-flow augmentation on year-round flows in 12 stream reaches .,..69
<br />
<br />Table 29. Summary of the evaluation of augmentation water supply alternatives ..,."....74
<br />
<br />Table 30. Elkhead Reservoir Enlargement, detailed cost estimate '.,...."......,....,. 75
<br />
<br />Table 31. Numbers of northern pike, smallmouth bass and channel catfish captured
<br />upstream from Yampa Canyon, 1999-2003 ..........,..................,,87
<br />
<br />Table 32. Nonnative fish control projects in the Yampa River in FY 2004-05 ..,.",..".88
<br />
<br />Table 33. Duration and magnitude of spillway flows based on bypassing unregulated
<br />inflows up to 540 cfs through the 72-inch (450 cfs) and 24-inch (90 cfs)
<br />outlets at Elkhead Reservoir ...','.,..,...,..,....,...,....".....,.." 96
<br />
<br />Table 34. Estimated cost of temporary screens and permanent screening options at
<br />
<br />Elkhead Res. ..,....,........,.,.,...",...,..",.........,.",..,.. 97
<br />
<br />Table 35. Floodplain habitat acquired in the Green River subbasin .,..,............." 100
<br />
<br />Management Plan for Endangered Fishes in the Yampa River Basin
<br />
<br />Xl
<br />
|