Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPENDIX II <br /> <br />APPENDIX II <br /> <br />These projections indicated the component option would <br />provide the poorest revenue flow. The repayment contribution <br />would fall to a balance of $14 million by 1992. Three <br />options--the modified postage stamp without deficits, double <br />postage stamp, and postage stamp options--provided better revenue <br />flows, .indicating that the repayment contribution would fall to <br />about $20 million in 1991. Revenue flow was not projected for <br />the modified postage stamp with deficits but was assumed to be <br />similar to that for the component option. According to Bureau <br />regional officials, all options produced sufficient revenues to <br />repay the existing plant-in-service by 2030. <br /> <br />Impact on customers <br /> <br />The options would have varying impacts on different types of <br />customers. Customers using all services would tend to pay the <br />highest rates under the component option. Customers using the <br />fewest services would pay the highest rates under the postage <br />stamp option. Figures 11.4 and 11.5 show projected rates for <br />customers along the San Luis Canal, who use all components, and <br />customers in the Sacramento River Valley, who use storage only. <br />The projected rates are shown for two assumptions: that the <br />contracts would be renegotiated in 1985 or that they would be <br />renegotiated after current contracts expire--2009 for San Luis <br />Canal and 2005 for Sacramento River Valley. <br /> <br />24 <br />