My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03422
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03422
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:21 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:43:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.111.O
Description
Central Utah Participating Project
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/9/1985
Author
US Gen. Accounting
Title
Report to the Honorable Howard M. Metzenbaum US Senate Bureau of Reclamation's Central Utah and Central Valley Projects Repayment Arrangements
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />APPENDIX II <br /> <br />APPENDIX II <br /> <br />EVOLUTION OF PROPOSED <br />RATE-SETTING POLICY <br /> <br />CVP has never had a comprehensive water service rate-setting <br />policy approved by the Secretary of the Interior. In recent <br />years, several events have emphasized the need for an approved <br />policy and have shaped the development of the current proposals. <br />In 1977 and 1978, the Interior Department's Inspector General <br />(IG) reviewed CVP's financial condition and evaluated policies <br />establishing water rates. The resulting reports3 identified <br />problems in achieving repayment of all reimbursable costs. They <br />specifically identified several Bureau practices in irrigation <br />and M&I water marketing activities as contributing to these <br />problems: <br /> <br />--The repayment period was extended each time that a <br />new facility was placed in service (rolling <br />repayment). <br /> <br />--Most contracts were long term and had rates that <br />were fixed (long-term rates). <br /> <br />--Irrigators' water rates were based on estimates of <br />their payment capacity (ability to pay). <br /> <br />--Interest applied to M&I operating deficits did not <br />reflect the actual cost of financing such deficits <br />(interest on deficits). <br /> <br />In addition to the above issues, the IG raised an issue <br />regarding facilities that were being constructed exclusively for <br />specific customers. The issue was, who will be required to pay <br />for isolated or out-of-basin facilities such as Foresthill Divide <br />and San Felipe: the exclusive beneficiaries or all CVP <br />customers? <br /> <br />The Bureau implemented an interim water service rate-setting <br />policy in 1981. In response to public input, continued IG <br />criticism, and the 1982 Reclamation Reform Act, which established <br />some new irrigation repayment requirements, the Bureau reanalyzed <br />and revised this policy. <br /> <br />b <br />t <br />~ <br />i <br /> <br />, <br />t <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />3Department of the Interior, Office of Audit and Investigation, <br />Review of Central Valley Project, Bureau of Reclamation, January <br />1978, LW-LBR-6-771 Department of the Interior, Office of <br />Inspector General, Review of Municipal and Industrial water <br />Activities, Central Valley Project, Bureau of Reclamation, <br />September 1979, LW-LBR-1-78. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.