Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPENDIX <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />1.1 <br /> <br />1.2 <br /> <br />Con ten t s <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />INFORMATION ON REPAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS FOR <br />THE BONNEVILLE UNIT OF THE CENTRAL UTAH <br />PROJECT <br />Background <br />Why GAO conducted its review <br />Cost allocation and repayment <br />Improper actions taken to allow <br />construction to continue <br />Modified cost allocation procedure <br />increased irrigation costs and <br />reduced power costs <br />Irrigators' ability to pay not <br />assessed since 1964 <br />M&I water supply and costs <br />Proposed repayment contracts would <br />provide $404 million more for <br />the district's M&I repayment <br />Repayment of M&I costs through power <br />revenues <br />Ute Deferral and Instream Flow <br />Agreements <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />3 <br />3 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />9 <br />10 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />INFORMATION ON REPAYMENT ARRANGEMENTS <br />FOR THE CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT <br />Background <br />Why GAO conducted its review <br />Cost allocation and repayment <br />Evolution of proposed rate-setting <br />policy <br />Irrigation rate-setting options <br />M&I rate-setting options <br />Water rate-setting policy issues <br />Repayment of facilities serving <br />isolated or out-of-basin customers <br />Contingencies may affect repayment <br /> <br />13 <br />13 <br />15 <br />16 <br /> <br />21 <br />22 <br />26 <br />29 <br /> <br />31 <br />33 <br /> <br />ILLUSTRATIONS <br /> <br />Cost allocation and repayment, <br />Bonneville Unit <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Cost allocations, Bonneville <br />Unit <br /> <br />9 <br />