My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03408
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:17 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:43:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10.B
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management-TWG
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/28/2003
Title
Summary of Results from Multi-Attribute Evaluation Workshop
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C\(j<jU <br /> <br />May 2003 <br /> <br />FIBure 3 Ranks Assigned to Alternatives by All Stakeholders by Direct and Swing Weighting <br />Methods .-:...,.b.c;:;;;o.. v.:; I.a- <br /> <br />Stakeholders <br /> <br />Method <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />DIrect <br />Swin <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />Swin <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />Swin <br />Dlrecl <br />SWln <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />Swin <br />Direct <br />SWln <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />Swi <br />Direct <br />S~ <br />Direct <br />Swin <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />MLFf <br /> <br />reo.... SedP\pe <br />MLfF Sand <br /> <br />Flow 0 POWER. Sed Pipe <br />NoActIOO Turbldlly <br /> <br />",.., <br /> <br />'k>wC <br /> <br />'k>wA <br /> <br /> <br />6.0 Conclusions and Next Steps <br /> <br />This MATA exercise was prepared and executed as a pilot exercise to explore the multi- <br />attribute approach. test specific methods. and determine their usefulness for GCDAMP in <br />future decision making. limitations included: <br />limited stakeholder participation. with the result that the full range of values of the TWG <br />membership was unlikely captured: <br />relatively short timeframe may not have allowed full discussion and understanding of the <br />attributes and the significance of the impacts; <br />set of attributes may be incomplete; <br />set of management options was incomplete; <br />some important aspects of uncertainty associated with some options were not fully <br />represented or discussed. <br /> <br />The lWG should therefore use caution in drawing any conclusions about selecting or rejecting <br />options on the basis of this analysis. However, as a test of methods, the pilot was quite useful. <br />Participants expressed unanimous support for the MATA approach. Key benefits included: <br />making values of aU stakeholders explicit; <br /> <br />GCDM'cP MAT A Pilot: <br />~y ZOO] Workshop Report <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.