My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03400
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03400
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:14 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:42:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.09.J
Description
Navajo Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/7/1970
Title
Method of Handling Blowdown Water at Navajo Generating Station
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />N <br />=: <br /> <br />"-y; <br /> <br />c..: <br /> <br />salt contained in the station's 3~~year average quantity of blowdown <br /> <br />water of 3,650 acre-feet pe~ year) will approach 29,000 tons under <br /> <br />present conditions, and approach 34,000 tons under future conditions. <br />The cost of the alternatives for disposing of the blowdown water <br />from the Navajo Generating Station, described on pages 6-1 and 6-3 <br />of the Bechtel report, were not included in the report but were ob- <br />tained by phone from Mr. W. V. Coane, Project Manager. The following <br />table shows cost data for the four least costly alternatives, together <br />with the incremental cost of each alternative over the cost of the <br /> <br />recommended proposal, its average annual value, and the resulting <br /> <br /> <br />unit cost of salt removal. The latter three cost items were derived <br /> <br />from the cost data provided by Mr. Coane. <br /> <br />TABLE I <br /> <br />ESTHlATED COST OF BLO\IDO\lN DISPOSAL <br /> <br />Alternatives for <br />Disposal of <br />Blm,dmm Hater <br /> <br />"'~Prcsent. <br />t'j"or'~:l of <br />All Cos ts <br />(ijillions <br />or $) <br /> <br />Incremental <br />Cost (p .\-10) <br />Over Least <br />Cost Alter- <br />native (Bil- <br />lions of $) <br /> <br />Incremental <br />Annual Cost <br />Over Least <br />Cost Alter- <br />native (Thou- <br />sands of $) <br /> <br />Increr.1cn tal <br />Unit Cost or <br />Sal t R0moval~~i" <br />($/ton/yr) <br /> <br />~~2 COi~jr,lcad.::: U Pi-O~O;:; cJ.l <br />Least Cost Alternative <br /> <br />Option IA--Jet Disposal <br />into Lake Pmrell iL 17 <br /> <br />Option 2A--Pretreatment <br />and Evaporation Pond 13072 <br /> <br />Option 3C--Electro- <br />dialysis 13083 <br /> <br />Option 4C--Pretreatment <br />and Flash Evaporation 14025 <br /> <br />5055 <br /> <br />396 <br /> <br />13020 <br /> <br />5.66 <br /> <br />404 <br /> <br />13050 <br /> <br />600G <br /> <br />434 <br /> <br />14.50 <br /> <br />* Based on a 35-year life for facilities and present worth factor of 14 for <br />annual costso <br /> <br />** Based on an average of 30,000 tons of salt removed per yearo <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.