Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3708 <br /> <br />Dan Law <br />November 30, 1981 <br />Page two <br /> <br />Assuming that 10,000 tons of salt would have to be removed from the river <br />system in order to reduce the TD5 concentration of Imperial Dam by 1 mg/L, the <br />best case achievement of zero salt discharge for all 18 permits considered would <br />only reduce the concentration at Imperial Dam by 1.7 mg/L. Relative to point <br />source salinity control proposals presented by the Bureau of Reclamation the <br />potential for significantly improving the water quality of the Colorado River by <br />controlling industrial discharges appears low. This observation is supported by <br />the relatively small amount of salt (tons) contributed by industrial discharges <br />as well as the relatively low salt concentrations (mg/L) associated with most <br />industrial discharges. AS a general rule, the cost-effectiveness of removing <br />salt from water with TD5 levels similar to those discussed above is much less <br />atttractive than removing salts from waters associated with natural point source <br />discharges, such as those investigated by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />Annual salt discharged and average TD5 concentration associated with Union <br />Carbide's permit (ico 0000515) deviate considerably from the other 17 permits <br />analyzed. In a IINo Salt Return Study" submitted February 4, 1980, Union Carbide <br />identified several alternatives which would reduce or eliminate salt discharges <br />from the facility. Costs ranged from $121 to $175/tons of salt removed. It was <br />determined by the Division of Water Quality that none of the possible <br />alternatives are economically feasible. The Division is currently in the <br />process of determining the Best Available Technology (BAT) for dealing with the <br />Uravan Mill discharge. One possibility is that Union Carbide will be required <br />to convert the mill to a non-discharging facility. <br /> <br />Although this analysis does not consider all sources of industrial <br />discharge to the Basin, it does look at a good cross section of discharges that <br />could be expected to contribute to the salt load in the river. The analysis <br />should serve well to contrast the significance of industrial point source <br />discarges with other natural and man-made contributors to Colorado River <br />salinity_ <br /> <br />D5/91 <br /> <br />-41- <br />