Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3668 <br /> <br />208 Clean Water Grant <br />Summary of September Through December Activities <br /> <br />Work under this contract was initiated in September, 1981 <br />with the personnel selection process. Over 40 applications were <br />received and 23 were given an oral examination. The top five <br />candidates were interviewed and an offer was extended to one <br />individual. The individual, Dean Stindt, accepted the offer and <br />began working on October 5. Mr. Stindt has a Bachelors of <br />Science degree in Natural Resources Management and has worked for <br />the Office of Surface Mining for two and one-half years. <br /> <br />In order to get Mr. Stindt acquainted with the salinity <br />control program in the Colorado River Basin, a thorough review of <br />several different reports was required. Once this was <br />accomplished, work was begun on the four items listed in the <br />"Scope of Services" in the contract. Initial emphasis was placed <br />on existing projects and their cost-effectiveness and the <br />inventorying and review of NPDES permits. While conducting this <br />work, Mr. Stindt wrote several memoranda which are attached in <br />the order they are discussed. <br /> <br />The initial project involved a review of all completed <br />feasibility and planning studies authorized by Title II of the <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law 93-320). <br />The review focused on the cost-effectiveness of the various <br />salinity control proposals. Since planning on many of the <br />projects was initiated several years ago, cost estimates were <br />updated to current levels. The cost-effectiveness analysis is <br />presented in a memorandum, dated November 2, 1981. The <br />individual salinity control proposals are listed as they decrease <br />in cost-effectiveness. The federal agency responsible for <br />conducting the study is identified, and, where applicable, the <br />title and date of the source document is also included. The <br />second part of the analysis graphically depicts the cumulative <br />cost-effectiveness ($l,OOO/mg/l/yr.) for all proposals and the <br />resultant cumulative reduction in salt concentration (mg/l) at <br />Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />As a follow up to the cost-effectiveness analysis, narrative <br />status su~naries were prepared for each of the salinity control <br />units identified in Title II of PL 93-320. For each unit, the <br />summary identified the location, total area involved, a <br />description of the various salinity sources and a quantification <br />of salts contributed by each source. This is followed by a <br /> <br />-1- <br /> <br />d220 <br />sum/208 <br />