Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />37(11 <br /> <br />COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br />J. William McDonald <br />Direclor <br /> <br />MEMORt\NDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Dan Law <br />Dean SUndt PB <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: November 17, 1981 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Colorado Water Quality Control Commission policy <br />for Implementing the Colorado River Salinity Standards <br />through the NPDES Permit Program <br /> <br />The Regulations concerning this subject were adopted on March 7, 1978 <br />and became effective on May 10, 1978. For all new industr ial discharge I <br />permits issued after May 10, 1978, and all existing industrial discharge <br />permits up for reissuance after May 10, 1978, the Water Quality Control <br />Commission has required that salinity be sampled on a monthly basis <br />until six samples have been analyzed. Following submittal of the first <br />six months of data, the Commission shall determine the eligibility for <br />a waiver of the no salt return policy based on salt-loading of less <br />than one ton per day. If this waiver cannot be granted, the permittee <br />has an additional six months to submit a report addressing the economic <br />practicability of achieving salt removal in accordance with Regulations <br />3.10.0-3.10.5 and Appendix A. Continued monitoring for salinity is <br />required.regardless of whether the less than one ton/day waiver is <br />granted or the practicability of salt removal study proves uneconomical. <br /> <br />The pOlicy with regard to municipal discharge permits is much the <br />same with one exception. The Commission shall allow municipal discharges <br />to release water with an incremental increase in salinity of 400 mg/L <br />or less above the flow weighted average salInity of the intake water <br />supply. Discharge in excess of the 400 mg/L incremental increase may <br />be permitted upon satisfactory demonstration by the permittee that <br />it is not practicable to attain the limit. <br /> <br />At this time, there are very few permits for which the implementa- <br />tion of no salt return policy has not been initiated. These instances <br />involve older permits up for reissuance and are currently being re- <br />written to require salinity monitoring. <br /> <br />Although the implementation of the policy has been initiated in <br />most cases, completion of the process has been slow. This is primarily <br />due to the fact that many of the industrial discharges to the Colorado <br />River Basin in Colorado are coal mine sedimentation ponds. The ponds <br />are often>times designed for full containment making it difficult to <br />obtain the first six months discharge data. In all situations where <br />the first six months data was available in the minimal amount of time <br />and salt-loading exceeded one ton/day, the permittee has been able to <br />convincingly demonstrate that salt removal is not economically practicable <br /> <br />DS:cs <br /> <br />-34- <br />