Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLAN FORMULATION <br /> <br />Planning Criteria <br /> <br />Plan formulation for the Lower Gunnison Basin Unit of the CRWQIP has <br />been conducted according to the Water Resources Council's Principles and <br />Standards for Water and Related Land Resource Planning (Principles and <br />Standards). Undar this process the problems and needs of the area to be <br />affected are first identified and the capability of the available resour- <br />ces to meet these problems and needs are evaluated. This evaluation of <br />needs and resources provides the basis for determining planning elements <br />that should be considered in the formulation of alternative plans. <br /> <br />Next, alternative plans for meeting the objectives of the study are <br />formulated and evaluated on an appraisal level to determine if they meet <br />the four tests listed in Principles and Standards for identifying viable <br />plans. These four tests include completeness, effectiveness, efficiency, <br />and acceptability. The four tests may be briefly identified as follows: <br />(1) completeness is the extent to which an alternative plan provides and <br />accounts for necessary investments or other actions to ensure the real- <br />ization of the planned effects; (2) effectiveness is the extent to which <br />an alternative alleviates the specified problem and achieves the desired <br />results; (3) efficiency is the extent to which an alternative is cost <br />effective; and (4) acceptability is the workability and viability of the <br />alternative in respect to acceptance by the public and adherence to <br />existing laws and regulations. <br /> <br />Alternative plans that pass all four tests become candidate plans and <br />are subject to much more detailed examination. The next step in the plan <br />formulation process entails subjecting each candidate plan to an analysis <br />under each of the four accounts identified in Principles and Standards. <br />These four accounts include (1) National Economic Development (NED), (2) <br />Environmental Quality (EQ), (3) Regional Economic Development (RED), and <br />(4) Other Social Effects (OSE). It is from these candidate plans and the <br />four account analysis that the most likely alternative was identified. Of <br />primary importance in the CRWQIP salinity investigations is the cost- <br />effectiveness criteria, which is part of the NED account analysis, or the <br />estimated cost per milligram per liter of reducing the salinity contribution <br />to the Colorado River from the unit area. <br /> <br />Initially, a wide range of general methods for salinity control were <br />considered in plan formulation including lining, pipe installation, canal <br />consolidation, sprinkler irrigation, soil sealants, desalinization, on-farm <br />improvement, irrigation management, and limitation on diversions. More than <br />30 general alternatives were developed which incorporated variations of <br />these general measures. Technical and economic criteria were then applied <br />to the alternatives and they were screened accordingly. After the prelim- <br />inary screening, a list of 12 representative alternative plans was devel- <br />oped. These alternatives are described on the following page. <br /> <br />11 <br />1;1', <br />:m <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />000913 <br />