Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />account for the dynamic and unpredictable nature of basin <br />hydrologic conditions. Operations are examined and modified <br />monthly as hydrologic conditions change. <br /> <br />In general, the same procedure is used for the remainder <br />of the Upper Basin reservoirs with the exception that no <br />downstream releases are required for Compact purposes. Using <br />the runoff forecast, the reservoirs are drawn down in the <br />fall and winter and allowed to fill during the spring runoff. <br />possible changes in these operating plans are taken into <br />account in preparing an operating plan for Lake Powell. <br /> <br />Redistributing excess flow releases would not place a <br />risk on the Upper Basin so long as such releases by <br />themselves do not result in the content of Lake Mead being <br />below that of Lake Powell on September 30 of that year, or <br />during subsequent years, thus triggering the equalization <br />provision of the Operating Criteria. This provision of the <br />Operating Criteria is not expected to be invoked during this <br />brief period of excess water if the operation of Lake Mead is <br />carefully moni tor ed and the appropr iateness of excess <br />releases are evaluated monthly. This is ensured if the <br />storage in Lake Mead remains above that in Lake Powell. <br /> <br />Similarly, it does not appear that an operation of the <br />Upper Basin reservoirs to obtain additional benefits would <br />adversely affect conservation storage in the Lower Basin <br />reservoirs so long as the additional releases do not force <br />flood control releases from Lake Mead that otherwise would <br />not have been required. This situation would occur only when <br />the release of excess flows from Lake Powell would raise the <br />contents of Lake Mead into the 1.5 million acre-foot <br />dedicated flood control space. <br /> <br />2.3.4 Water Use/Conservation Considerations <br /> <br />With full reservoirs and the Basin's present and <br />anticipated level of water needs through 1992, excess river <br />water is likely to occur even with below normal runoff <br />condi tions. However, for all of the Basin states' Colorado <br />River water needs to be met during this period, the Secretary <br />of the Interior must either formally declare a "surplus river <br />condition" or allow the beneficial Colorado River water needs <br />in excess of a state's basic apportionment to be met by <br />utilizing unused apportionments of other states. <br /> <br />presently, California is the only Basin state using or <br />capable of using more Colorado River water than its basic <br />apportionment. However, with the commencement of the Central <br />Arizona project (CAP) water deliveries in December 1985, <br />California is limited to its basic apportionment of 4.4 maf <br />of Colorado River water per year, unless the Secretary of the <br /> <br />-13- <br />