My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03356
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03356
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:58 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:40:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/8/1952
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Since 1951 the survey has been compiling in one series of reports <br />summaries of all stream flow records collected throughout the nation prior <br />to 1950. The records are critically examined, revised where necessary, and <br />estimates made to fill in short breaks. Because of its size, this project <br />will be spread over several years, beginning with records for areas where <br />the need appears most urgent, as the Colorado River Basin. About 85 percent <br />of the records for the Basin have been compiled and it is contemplated that <br />the report will be ready for publication as a water-supply paper by 1954. <br /> <br />When the upper Colorado R!ver Compact was approved, the all-Federal <br />program of stream gaging, sediment, and chemical quality investigations was <br />expanded in that region as it was recognized by the Upper Colorado River <br />Commission that additional data were essential to carry out the terms of <br />the Compact. Funds for expansion were made available by Congress following <br />a request by the affected States. However, the new network covers only part <br />of that requested and needed. At present, 45 gaging stations are operated <br />in the Upper Basin with these ''Upper Basin Compact" funds. In addition, 29 <br />gaging stations in both upper and Lower Basins are operated with Colorado <br />River Compact funds, which first became available to the Survey on July 1, 1928. <br /> <br />As an example of the importance of these records: Article III of the <br />Colorado River Compact provides for apportionment of water among the upper <br />and Lower Basins and the Republic of Mexico. It states that further appor- <br />tionment of the beneficial uses of the waters of the Colorado River System <br />not apportioned by the Compact 11JB.y be made after OctOber 1, 1963, if and <br />when either basin shall have reached its total beneficial consumptive use <br />as provided in the Compact. It is imperative, therefore, that we plan so <br />that by 1963, we will have the basic data necessary to resolve questions <br />that will arise. <br /> <br />Equitable apportionment of Colorado River water requires answers to <br />two main questions: (1) What is the geographical source of the water, (2) and <br />what disposal is made of it? As present stream flow records are inadequate <br />for resolving these questions, proposals have been made to increase substantially <br />the number of gaging stations throughout the basin. The proposed stations number <br />about 400, more than half of which are in the present program. Not all the <br />stations nOW operated are in this group, because many are operated for specific <br />purposes not directly related to the questions cited above. <br /> <br />Examination by Survey district engineers of these proposals disclosed <br />that many of the new locations would be not readily accessible-- some virtually <br />inaccessible at times. Furthermore, because of shifting channels and flashy <br />runoff, frequent measurements might be necessary to insure accuracy, particularly <br />at high stages. As times of high stage usually coincide with times of inacces- <br />sibility, resident hydrographers probably would be required at some stations. <br />Construction and operation of those stations would, therefore, be costly. It <br />is recognized that the cost, although a reason for careful scrutiny of a pro- <br />posed station, cannot be the main criterion. <br /> <br />Same of the stations proposed would be on transmountain diversions, <br />for some of which records are obtained by other agencies but not reviewed by <br />the Surveyor published in Water-Supply Papers. In view of the importance of <br />such records for compact information, they should be an integral part of the <br />basin-wide network. <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.