Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nr.1,~:5"7 <br />lJ..._ wi <br /> <br />Affected Environment & Consequences <br /> <br />3-15 <br /> <br />design flow, the amount of water diverted from the Gunnison River would be less. <br />Consequently, vegetative encroachment into the channel would be reduced. However, <br />this effect is also minimized by the periodic high flows, which are unaffected by any of <br />the development alternatives. <br /> <br />3.4.3 Impacts of Alternatives - Uncompahgre River <br /> <br />3.4.3.1 Alternative A (No Action) <br /> <br />Under the No Action alternative, the Uncompahgre River upstream of the study area <br />would become a more narrow and stable river, influenced by Ridgway Reservoir. Within <br />the study area (downstream from the South Canal), infrequent major flow events could <br />cause significant river channel changes. Bank stabilization by individuals and local <br />governments in response to these events would continue. <br /> <br />3.4.3.2 Development Alternatives <br /> <br />The AB Lateral penstock would be used to convey some of the irrigation flows that now <br />flow into the Uncompahgre River. Specifically, irrigation demands from the Selig, <br />Ironstone, and East that are met with diversions from the Gunnison River will be diverted <br />from the South Canal, into the AB Lateral and through the penstock to the Uncompahgre <br />River. In addition, these flows could be supplemented by new diversion, when flows are <br />available and in accordance with priorities discussed in Chapter 2. This change would <br />increase the volume of flow in the Uncompahgre River. Several individuals expressed <br />concern during the PElS that this change would lead to substantial erosion and <br />degradation of the Uncompahgre River. The Sponsors have conducted studies regarding <br />the river's hydraulic and morphologic conditions to quantify potential impacts. <br /> <br />Method of Analysis <br /> <br />The Sponsors collected samples of the river sediments found in the bed and banks and <br />combined this information with hydrologic and hydraulic models to determine the <br />impacts of project flows, Two approaches were used in this analysis: critical particle size <br />and the ratio of the channel width to depth when flows are at bankfull. <br /> <br />A stable riverbed is one in which bed material exceeds a certain particle size threshold. <br />This size is a function of the channel slope, flow, width, and material characteristics. If <br />flows exceed a critical stable value based upon this threshold, the stream can generally <br />react in any of 3 ways: <br /> <br /> <br />. Degradation, where the bed lowers until slope is reduced to the point where critical <br />shear is no longer exceeded, or the transport capacity equals the sediment supply. <br /> <br />. Bed coarsening, where larger and larger cobbles are left as the smaller-sized materials <br />are moved downstream, This will slow and eventually halt degradation as mean <br />particle sizes increase to and exceed the critical sizes. <br /> <br />AS Lateral Hydropower Project <br /> <br />'< <br />r 'i <br />'i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />July 2000 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />J <br />, <br />. t <br /> <br />~ ~ ..fuf,.L. ,M,- .1(1: <~ <br /> <br /><< ~ <br /> <br />'''.-,"-2.<1__,<,$-, <br />