Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~;'i~ ~ti <br />t,; .' .._ " _~ . <br /> <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />ES-4 <br /> <br />Uncompahgre Rivers to irrigate lands in Delta and Montrose Counties. Water <br />diverted from the Gunnison River and Tunnel is delivered to the Uncompahgre <br />through the South Canal and Cedar Creek. After entering the Uncompahgre River, <br />Gunnison River flows are combined with Uncompahgre River flows and diverted into <br />six major canal systems. Mean annual diversions from the Gunnison River are <br />368,750 acre-feet. <br />. Alternative E-! (the Sponsors' preferred action). This is the alternative that was <br />approved in the PElS, The hydropower facility would have a capacity of 950 cfs. <br />Mean annual diversions from the Gunnison River are 654,910 acre-feet, an increase <br />of 286,160 acre-feet. <br />. Alternative E-2. All factors would be identical to those of Alternative E-l, except <br />that the capacity of the AB Lateral Facility would be reduced to 850 cfs. Mean <br />annual diversions from the Gunnison River are 633,900 acre-feet, an increase of <br />265,150 acre-feet. <br />. Alternative E-3. All factors would be identical to those of Alternative E-l, except <br />that the capacity of the AB Lateral Facility would be reduced to 750 cfs. Mean <br />annual diversions from the Gunnison River are 610,000 acre-feet, an increase of <br />241,250 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Major Environmental Impacts <br /> <br />Reclamation evaluated the potential for impacts to local and regional environmental and <br />socioeconomic resources associated with change from the PElS. Development of the <br />proposed project would impact several resource categories, including: <br /> <br />. Streamtlows - Flows in the Uncompahgre River would be substantially increased <br />downstream of the proposed powerplant, while flows in the Gunnison River would be <br />. reduced. <br /> <br />. River Morphology - Increased flow in the Uncompahgre River is expected to <br />increase bank erosion and channel instability. The average channel width could <br />increase as much as 30 feet. Sponsors have proposed an extensive plan to mitigate <br />impacts and to continue monitoring bank erosion after project operations begin. <br /> <br />. Wetlands - Development of the project and bank stabilization program would result <br />in direct and indirect impacts to riparian wetlands along the AB Lateral and <br />Uncompahgre River. Acreage affected ranges between 36 and 57 acres, depending <br />upon the alternative. Development of the project is also expected to increase <br />wetlands along the Uncompahgre River, resulting in a net, long-term gain of between <br />54 and 91 acres. <br /> <br />. Water Quality - Channel instability during the initial years of operation is expected <br />to increase turbidity and suspended sediment. Over the life of the project, these <br />parameters are expected to return to current levels. Inputs of saIt and selenium to the <br />Uncompahgre and Gunnison Rivers are expected to decrease due to the lining of the <br />AB Lateral, the method of operation of the project, and anticipated structural <br />improvements to the UVRP financed with project revenues. <br /> <br />-.' <br />:-" <br /> <br />- <br />, <br /> <br />AB Lateral Hydropower Project <br /> <br />July 2000 <br /> <br /> <br /><,-, <br />