My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03331
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:39:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.430
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations-Entities - Gunnison - UVWUA - AB Lateral
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/2000
Author
DOI
Title
AB Lateral Hydropower Project - Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />n01596 <br /> <br />Alternatives, Including Proposed Action <br /> <br />2-26 <br /> <br />An additional site, including 300 feet of hard points at site 32A, has since been added. <br />Most sites are located at bends where there is ample room for the river to widen on its <br />opposite side. The river would therefore tend to widen in the direction opposite to the <br />stabilization. Figures 2-10 and 2-11 show the general locations of the bank stabilization <br />measures. Table 2-2 summarizes stabilization proposals by protection type; Table 2-3 <br />presents the same information, segregated by selection criteria. <br /> <br />Bank energy indexes were calculated for each potentially feasible altemative (E-l, E-2, <br />and E-3). Although values changed, the net result was the same recommended overall <br />protection plan for each of these options. One site dropped below the BEl threshold <br />criterion for 750 cfs. However, it was retained in the program because field judgement <br />indicated that is would likely erode at flows well below 750 cfs, and an agricultural field <br />would be at risk. <br /> <br />Not all cases of bank erosion need to be arrested. The reason is that the natural erosion <br />and accretionS process is generally considered to be environmentally beneficial, providing <br />the dynamic conditions necessary for wetlands rejuvenation and growth. In addition, <br />confining the channel on both sides would increase the risk of channel degradation. <br /> <br />Table 2-2. Summary of Proposed Stabilization Measures, by Stabilization Type <br /> <br /> Total Length Rock Volume <br />Type No. of sites feet cubic yards <br />New riprap 13 3,785 8,660 <br />Supplement riprap 12 3,960 5,426 <br />Both new and supplement riprap 3 1,230 2,471 <br />New hard points 17 7,120 3,875 <br />Supplement hard points 5 2,230 940 <br />Total 50 18,325 21,372 <br /> <br />Table 2-3. Summary of Proposed Stabilization Measures, by Selection Criteria <br /> <br />Criterion <br /> <br />Infrastructure <br />Agricultural <br />Special conditions <br />Total <br /> <br />No. of sites <br />24 <br />15 <br />11 <br />50 <br /> <br />Total Length <br />feet <br />7,245 <br />6,320 <br />4,760 <br />18,325 <br /> <br />Rock Volume <br />cubic yards <br />9,623 <br />5,642 <br />6,107 <br />21,372 <br /> <br />With the landowners' permission, construction access to bank stabilization sites would be <br />provided by farm and field lanes wherever possible. The Sponsors would construct <br />temporary lanes from fields to the bank revetment site where necessary. In places where <br /> <br />Accretion means the slow addition of 'and by deposition of water-borne sediment. <br /> <br />'r;- ^' _.~'., = <br /> <br /> <br />AS Lateral Hydropower Project <br /> <br />July 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.