My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03330
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03330
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:39:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.913
Description
Platte River Basin-Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies-Windy Gap/Foothills
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/26/1976
Title
Foothills Project-Denver Board of Water Commissioners Position on Eagles Nest Wilderness Legislation Pending Before US Congress
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Estimated capital and operating oosts of alternative plans have <br /> <br /> <br />been developed. ,Onder S.. 268, as previously reported to Senator <br /> <br /> <br />Haskell bv letter dated May 1, 1975, annual pumping oosts are es- <br />- <br /> <br />timated to be $1 million. Additional oosts covering replaoements <br /> <br />and capital expenditures to provide pumping facilities amount to <br />$2.4 mil~on annually. For comparison purposes the total estimated <br />cost increase is $3.4 million annually, and over a 40-year period, <br />without considering inflation, this totals $136 million. <br />.Additional costs created by the Johnson Bill have been developed <br /> <br />on a comparable basis coveri~g capital oonst--uction, replacement, <br /> <br />interest c.~arges and energy costs. Again, without considering in- <br /> <br />flation, the costs total lIlOre than a half billon dollars over a <br /> <br />40-year period or $13.2 million annually where maximum pumping is <br />required. <br /> <br />But whatever the cost the same water, owned by the City of <br /> <br /> <br />Denver, can be recovered by g:t'avity without t.l'le additional expenditure <br /> <br /> <br />of money or the huge energy requirement. Incremental costs under <br /> <br /> <br />any alte:rnative plan !!lUst be passed on to water users. The Board <br /> <br />has a continuous obligation to bring to the attention to Metropolit~~ <br />I <br /> <br />Denver water user~ the very serious financial burden which an a~larged <br /> <br /> <br />wilderness area will impose on them. We cannot overlook the enormous <br /> <br />burden of additional legal expenses associated wi~~ suits for ch~~ge <br /> <br /> <br />or alternate points of diversiori, the possible necessity for securing <br /> <br /> <br />a presidential exception to an improvidently large wilderness at <br /> <br />Eagle's Nest, or need of Cong:t'essional modification of existing <br /> <br />legislation and interpretation of Sub-surface t~~el uses, or ~~e <br /> <br />00742 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.