Laserfiche WebLink
<br />S-Minute Activity Report <br />127th Meeting of AWRBIAC <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />C) <br />('-; <br />~ <br />o <br />--.l <br />CJ <br /> <br />There has been significant interest in reorganization and consolidation among the <br />environmental agencies following an interim study by the State House of Representatives. <br />However, the shortened legislative session mandated in a statewide referendum last year has <br />worked against any meaningful reform this Session. (The Constitutional amendment passed <br />by state voters required that legislators meet for no more than 90 days in regular session and <br />adjourn no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 31 of each year.) <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Interstate Comnaet News <br /> <br />Oklahoma and Texas claimed New Mexico violated compact terms regarding the amount <br />of water storage capacity aJlowed to New Mexico, due to New Mexico enlarging Ute Dam <br />on the Canadian River near Tucumcari, in 1984. After the problem could not be resolved <br />at several compact meetings, Oklahoma and Texas sued New Mexico in April 1987. The <br />Ute Dam case was studied by Jerome C. Muys, appointed Special Master by the U,S. <br />Supreme Court, who issued a 11S-page report in 1990. The Special Master concluded that <br />New Mexico had violated the Compact and recommended a decree to order the matter sent <br />back to the Compact Commission to try to determine whether and to what extent water may <br />be stored in the desilting pool portion of the sediment pool without chargeability as <br />conservation storage. The U.S. Supreme Court then heard oral arguments from Oklahoma <br />and other litigants on April 16, 1991. A final decision is expected by July. <br /> <br />The Annual meeting of the Red River Compact was held at the offices of the Oklahoma <br />Water Resources Board on April 30, 1991. Attending were commissioners from Arkansas, <br />Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma. Oklahoma has two new commissioners--Patty Eaton, the <br />new Executive Director of the OWRB, who chaired the meeting, and Ken Fergeson, who <br />was appointed by the Governor on December 17, 1991. The next meeting will be held in <br />Texas in 1992. <br /> <br />The Kansas-Oklahoma Compact meeting wiJl be held at Shangri-la Lodge on Grand Lake <br />in northeastern Oklahoma on September 24, 1991, and the Arkansas-Oklahoma Compact <br />meeting wiJl be held September 25, 1991, at the same location. <br /> <br />State Q,f Oklahoma SUTJreme Court O,pinion <br />R~ardinr RiTJarWn. Rirhts <br /> <br />The Oklahoma Supreme Court case dealing with the constitutionality of Oklahoma's 28-year <br />old stream water appropriation law remains umesolved. The first opinion in the case, issued <br />in 1987, said three things: (1) that the Board must consider groundwater rights held by an <br />applicant for a stream water right, (2) that applicants who propose to use the water out of <br />basin of origin may lose their rights later to the extent uses in the basin increase, and (3) <br />common law riparian rights to a reasonable use must be protected when the Board considers <br />applications for appropriation permits. The OWRB asked for a rehearing of that opinion. <br />