|
<br />
<br />
<br />SUMMARY
<br />
<br />Table B.--Features of the NED and Project Sponsor's plans
<br />
<br />Features
<br />
<br />Total irrigated acres
<br />Ground-water depths'
<br />Average annual diversion
<br />Ground-water reoharge
<br />storage (acre-feet annually)
<br />Wildlife storage (acre-feet)
<br />Wildlife flow augmenta-
<br />tion (acre-feet),
<br />
<br />Main facilities
<br />Wildlife reservoir
<br />wildlife storage (acre-feet I
<br />Recharge reservoirs
<br />Recharqe storage
<br />(acre-feet)
<br />Recharge ponds (No.)
<br />Ground-water recharge
<br />(acre-feet annually)
<br />Diversion dam (350 ft Is)
<br />Pumping plant (250 ft'ls)
<br />Open supply system (miles)
<br />Closed supply system (miles)
<br />Habitat management areas
<br />(acres)
<br />
<br />Cost of main faoilities
<br />Wildlife storage reservoirs
<br />Recharge storage reservoirs
<br />Recharge ponds and pipe
<br />laterals
<br />Diversion dam
<br />Pumping plant
<br />Open supply system
<br />Habitat management
<br />O&M equipment (recharge)
<br />Fish and wildlife
<br />(mitigation and
<br />enhancement)
<br />Recreation (facilities)
<br />O&M equipment (habitat)
<br />
<br />Project cost (includes.
<br />habitat plan, fish and
<br />wildlife, and recreation)
<br />(rounded)
<br />
<br /> Project
<br /> Sponsor's
<br />NEO plan plan
<br />190,800 232,800
<br />+9 +15
<br />54,400 87.700
<br />52,900 42,000
<br />30,300 22,000
<br />1 1
<br />252,000 252,000
<br />5 8
<br />58,150 107, 690
<br />24 24
<br />48,500 77 , 600
<br />1 1
<br />0 1
<br />45 72
<br />35 35
<br />14,065 14,065
<br />$173.000,000 $165,500,000
<br />62,700,000 139,576,000
<br />18.000,000 18,000,000
<br />6,100,000 6,100,000
<br />0 5,900,000
<br />46,000,000 66,710,000
<br />27,000,000 27.000,000
<br />1,800,000 4,300,000
<br />1,274,900 1,431,000
<br />4,131,000 6,311,000
<br />2,700,000 2,700,000
<br />
<br />$343.000,000
<br />
<br />$443,000,000
<br />
<br />Annual cost
<br />Energy
<br />Economic cost of energy2
<br />OM&R'
<br />(rounded)
<br />
<br />o
<br />o
<br />910,000
<br />
<br />35.300
<br />110,300
<br />1,211,955
<br />1,212,000
<br />
<br />1 Average qroynd-water elevation increase of the Prairie Bend Unit compared to
<br />the future without condition.
<br />, Used instead of P-SMB assigned cost in economic analysis. The cost is
<br />computed as 22.2 mills/Kwhr minus 2.5 mills/Kwhr OM&R cost = 19.7 mills/Kwhr.
<br />, Includes equipment replacement reserve using 8-7/8 percent sinking funds.
<br />
<br />S-5
<br />
<br />~r
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />--.-
<br />
|