Laserfiche WebLink
<br />State Water Laws <br /> <br />,:,:::(",:, <br />~.:.....:--.~ <br />....:..... <br /> <br />M <br />00 <br />00 <br />W <br /> <br />While the "Law of the River" governs the allocation of water among the <br />States of the Colorado River. Basin, the use of water by individual claimants <br />within a State is subject to the water laws of each State. <br /> <br />Surface Water. Although each Upper Basin State has its own water <br />rights system, the basic elements of these are sufficiently similar to <br />permi! certain. generalizations to be made for the purposes of this assess- <br />ment. The cornerstone of each Upper Basin State's water rights system is <br />the doctrine of prior appropriation. Under this doctrine, those who are <br />first in time to take steps to divert and apply water to a beneficial use <br />(i.e., senior rights) have a right that is superior to those who subse- <br />quently initiate an appropriation (i.e., junior rights). As a consequence,. <br />junior right holders are required to cease diverting or storing water <br />whenever the remaining flow of a river is not sufficient to satisfy all <br />senior downstream rights. <br /> <br />With respect to the right to obtain an appropriation, the water laws <br />of the Upper Basin States fall into one of two basic categories. In <br />Colorado, the right to make an appropriation of water (i.e., to divert <br />water and apply it to a beneficial use) is subject only to the limitation <br />that other vested water rights cannot be impaired. Thus, neither the <br />courts nor the executive branch of government has discretionary authority <br />over the type, place, or quantity of use. <br /> <br />~{tl~ <br /> <br />In contrast to Colorado, the other four States (Arizona, New Mexico, <br />Utah, and Wyoming) employ a permit system in.which the right to appropriate <br />.water must be approved by the State Engineer. In each State, as in <br />Colorado, the right to appropriate is subject to the condition that other <br />vested (i.e., senior) water rights not be impaired~ Unlike Colorado, <br />however, the laws of the other four States permit the State Engineer to <br />deny an application if it is found to be contrary to the "public welfare" or <br />"public interest'" (the actual statutory language varies from State .to State). <br />However, the exercise of this authority in the past has been very limited. <br /> <br />In recognition of the fact that it takes a good deal of time to plan <br />for and actually construct a water diversion facility, each of the Upper <br />Basin States allows water rights to be claimed as of the date the first <br />steps were taken to actually divert water or an application was received. <br />However., it may be many years before water is actually put to a beneficial <br />use. <br /> <br />In Colorado, conditional rights are granted by the water courts. <br />Claimants who are, with "due diligence," proceeding to perfect their rights <br /> <br />I. The reader is cautioned, however, against relying upon this discussion <br />to answer detailed water law questions since the specifics of each Upper <br />Basin State's water laws vary considerably from State to State. <br /> <br />~'~" ";. <br />'''':-',-; <br /> <br />xxxvi <br />