WSP03308 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" . . Area Manager DRAFT 36 Federal Actions Throughout Subspecies Range. Since listing in 1995, at least 47 Federal agency actions have undergone (or are currently under) formal section 7 consultation throughout o' ,.. ~~ ~""""'."'" no__._ _.L~_n_ L____ ___..1.._.:.1 ~_ ~~..._..._A.. ...I......~;.......+;^....'" ~Ao:t.n" !:lIf"t;u;t;pc;: Ul~ OlfO S rang~ tJ aOJt~ 'i). ,:)IA i1\;lIUJl~ Uc1V~ J.~':)UlLl,;.U ill J'-'VJ.1WUJ U\.lU.,.lu.auu.u..lv.u.... ..............J --... --.-"- continue to adversely affect the distribution and extent of occupied and potential breeding habitat throughout its range (development, grazing, recreation, dam operations, etc.). Stochastic events also continue to adversely affect the distribution and extent of occupied and potential breeding habitat. For example, a catastrophic fire in June of I 996, destroyed approximately one half mile of occupied habitat on the San Pedro River in Pinal County. That fire resulted in the forced dispersal or loss of up to eight pairs of flycatchers (Paxton et al. 1996). Analysis of the Species/Critical Habitat Likely to be Affected The proposed action would take place in occupied habitats for the flycatcher that are important breeding and recovery habitat areas for the subspecies in relation to its rangewide distribution. No critical habitat for the flycatcher is designated in the action area. Recovery of this species will require these habitats to be able to support flycatchers at higher levels than are currently present. Environmental baseline The environmental baseline includes the past and present impacts of all Federal, State, and private actions and other human activities in the action area; the anticipated impacts of all proposed Federal projects in the action area that have already undergone formal section 7 consultation; and the impact of State or private actions contemporaneous with the consultation process. All projects previously built or consulted on, and those State or private projects presently being built or considered that deplete water from the San Juan River Basin are in the environmental baseline for this proposed action. The baseline does not include the effects of the action under review. Although the San Juan River was once a relatively small portion of the overall range of these species, the importance of these populations has increased with the extensive loss of habitat from the lower Colorado Basin. In this section we discuss the status of the species in the action area and factors affecting these species and their criti cal habitat including dams and their effects on the riverine habitat, water quality, propagation programs for the species, water depletions, diversion structures, and non-native species. Status ofthe species within the action aea Colorado pike minnow Platania and Young (1989) sununarized historic fish collections in the San Juan River drainage that indicate that pikeminnow once inhabited reaches above what is now the Navajo Dam and Reservoir near Rosa, New Mexico. Because of Lake Powell and Navajo Reservoir, approximately 161 km (100 mi) of San Juan Riverh{lbitat was directly lost for the two endangered fishes (Holden 2000). Since closure of Navajo Dam in 1963, the accompanying fish o (J H !, ~J