Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />".. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Area Manager <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Consultation History <br /> <br />On December 28, 1979, the Service issued a BO for the proposed Animas-La Plata Project. It <br />concluded that the project was not likely to jeopardize the bald eagle, pikeminnow, or razorback <br />sucker. One of the conservation recommendations from the 1979 BO requested thorough <br />surveys of the native fish in the San Juan River. Surveys'between May 1987 and October 1989 <br />found 10 adult and 18 young of the year (YOY) pikeminnow and the presence of adult razorback <br />sucker in the San Juan River (Platania et al. 1991). <br /> <br />On February 6, 1990, Reclamation reinitiated the Animas-La Plata consultation. On May 7, <br />1990, the Service issued a draft BO concluding that the project would jeopardize the continued <br />existence of the pikeminnow, but offered no reasonable and prudent alternative to the project in <br />the draft opinion. Reclamation and the Service cooperatively developed a reasonable and <br />prudent alternative. The Service issued a final BO on October 25, 1991, which concluded that <br />the project, as proposed, would likely jeopardize the continued existence of the pikeminnow and <br />razorback sucker. The clements of the reasonable and prudent alternative provided in that 80 <br />were that Reclamation would: I) limit initial dcpletions to 57,100 acre-feet (af); 2) implement 7 <br />years of research to determine endangered fish habitat needs; 3) operate Navajo Dam to ptovide <br />300,000 af/year and a wide range of flow conditions for the endangered fish); 4) guarantee that, <br />based on the results of the research program and dependent upon the prevailing hydrology, <br />Navajo Reservoir would be operated for the life of the Animas-La Plata Project to mimic a <br />natural hydro graph based on the research; 5) provide legal protection for the reservoir releases <br />instream to and through the endangered fish habitat to Lake Powell, and a commitment to <br />develop and implement a Recovery Implementation Program for the San Juan River. The San <br />Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRIP) for endangered fish species was <br />initiated on November I, 1992. The SJRIP was intended to conserve populations of pikeminnow <br />and razorback sucker in the San Juan River Basin consistent with the Act, and proceed with <br />water development in the Basin in compliance with federal and state laws, interstate compacts, <br />Supreme Court decrees, and Federal trust responsibilities to the Southern Ute, Ute Mountain, <br />Jicarilla, and the Navajo Nations (SJRIP 1995). <br /> <br />Reclamation requested initiation of section 7 consultation on Navajo Dam operations on June 30, <br />199 I. The Service responded on August 19, 1991, and agreed that the timeframe for the <br />consultation would continue through the research period, enabling Reclamation to gather data on <br />the endangered fish. <br /> <br />In 1996, the Service issued a BO based on a Biological Assessment (BA) for full development of <br />the Animas-La Plata Project. Full development consisted of a 191,230 af annual diversion and a <br />149,220 af annual depletion. The BO found the proposed project would likely jeopardize the <br />continued existence of pikeminnow and razorback suckers. The elements of the reasonable and <br />prudent alternative included: I) Only those project features that result in a maximum depletion <br />of57,100 af(Phase I, stage A) would be constructed, until all elements of the reasonable and <br />prudent alternative were completed. However, if Reclamation could provide a minimum winter <br />flow out of Navajo Dam of approximately 300 cfs on a recurring basis and mimic a natural <br />hydrograph, then Stage A could be operated with 57, I 00 af as an average annual depletion. After <br /> <br />OUH03 <br />