My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03306
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:40 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:39:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.300
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Colorado River Consumptive Uses and Losses Report
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1984
Title
Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Report 1976 - 1980
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:-:'~~t <br />1 <br />J <br />, <br />j' <br /> <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />Crops in the Southwestern United <br />States," issued. May 1982 by the United <br />States Depart~ent of Agriculture. <br />Effective precipitation was derived <br />from criteria developed for the area by <br />Wayne D. Criddle, former Utah State <br />Engineer. <br />These theoretical consumptive use <br />calculations were based on the assump- <br />tion of full water supply during the <br />crop growing season. However, it is <br />estimated that in an average year about <br />37- percent of the irrigated lands in <br />the Upper Basin receive less than a <br />full supply of water, either due to <br />lack of distribution facilities or <br />junior water rights. The degree ~o <br />which these Hinds suffer shortages <br />varies widely from year to year, <br />depending in large part on the magni- <br />tude of runoff. For this study, an <br />estimate of the short suppl-y 'service <br />lands was made for each sub-basin, <br />primarily on the basis of reports and <br />inves t igat ion's co llec ted for the <br />comprehensive' framework study. A <br />stream-flow gaging stat~on was selected <br />within each sub~basin and the magnitude <br />of the recessional portion of the <br />annual hydrograph was used as an index <br />to select the date at which consumptive <br />use calc'ulations should be terminated <br />for the short supply lands. <br />Comprehensive framework studies of <br />the incidental consumptive use of water <br />associated witn irrigation indicated <br />that this use varied between' 5 and 28 <br />percent of the irrigation consumptive <br />use depending upon the location of the <br />study area within the Colorado Basin. <br />These percentages were used in the <br />Upper Basin and an average value of l5 <br />percent was used in the Lower Basin to <br />adjuat the calculated consumptive <br />use. <br />The agricultural data is generally <br />adequate for use in this report. With <br />the exception of Utah, each state <br />pre pared annu'al coun t y i rr igat ed <br />acreage estima'tes of the harvested <br />crops during the reporting period. <br />These statistics are assumed to be <br />reliable. The irrigated pasture values <br />were based largely on the 1978 National <br />Census of Agriculture since the State <br />statistics do not include pastureland. <br /> <br />w <br />~ <br />lA. <br />~ <br /> <br />Due to the length of time between <br />reporting dates, this item needs to be <br />considerably strengthened. In this <br />regard, Wyoming and New Mexico have <br />initiated aerial photographic' mapping <br />of their State's irrigated acreage to <br />verify the annual statistical sampling. <br />Other areas of agricultural data <br />collection Which need to be updated and <br />verified are 0) 'the consumptive water, <br />use of lands which receive less than a <br />full seasonal supply of irrigation <br />water and the areal extent of these <br />lands, and (2) the,amount of incidental <br />seepage and phreatophytic losses <br />associated with irrigation. <br /> <br />Reservoir Evaporation: A comprehen- <br />s.ive listing was developed ,of all <br />reservoirs in the Colorado River Basin <br />which included the_ latitude, elevation, <br />and surface area at total capacity for <br />each reservoir. <br />Monthly content records were ob- <br />tained for those, reservoirs for Which <br />records are available. The average <br />annual water-surface area was deter- <br />mined for each year of the reporting <br />period. For those reservoirs lacking <br />records, a "fu lines s tac.tor" was <br />estimated on the basis of reservoir use <br />and historical hydrologic 'conditions. <br />These "fullness factors" were then used <br />to obtain es timates of average annual, <br />water-surface area for the unreported <br />reservoirs. <br />For tha ~ajority of the basin, <br />historical evaporation rates were used <br />to determine reservoir evaporation. <br />In the Upper Basin, regression <br />equations relating gross annual evap- <br />oration to elevation, latitude, and <br />climatic subarea were developed for <br />each of the reporting years. In the <br />Lower Basin, evaporation values were <br />calculated for each climatic subarea. <br />Account was taken of precipitation and <br />runoff salvage to determine net evapor- <br />ation rates. The net evaporation rates <br />were applied to the estimates of <br />average annual water-surface area to <br />yield the values of annual reservoir <br />evaporation. <br />An exception to this procedure was <br />the determination of evaporation from <br />the main stem reservoirs shown in <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.