Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~,;:;~'.'. l ~\ . <br />',', ,,<,.. <br /> <br />the state permit number or water court case number, th~ <br />yield, the d~pth, and the irrigated acres, if known, for <br />each well. <br />11. . There are several reco~endations for future study which can <br />be made based! upon this study and some of the conclusions reached: <br />. (a) A more detailed and complete water balance needs to be <br />made us.ing more accurate basic data, particularly on the river diversions, <br />the present uogaged surface flows entering the river, within the study <br />reach, the gr~und water underflows into the study area, and volume of water <br /> <br />. , <br />pumped from the ground water aquifer. <br />; (b) A more extensive analysis of data is required, particularli <br />water level da~ain wells and more thorough modelling techniques to evaluate <br />the possibl il i~y as hypothesized in this study that the safe perennial yield <br />in certain arells has not been reached. <br />!(c) A computer model study.which includes all of the variables,' <br />for the study .rea needs to be developed, fully documented, and utilized for. <br />evaluating spe~ific alternative methods for conserving or improving beneficia" <br />use of the South Platte Basin water. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />-ii' <br /> <br />