My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03268
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:30 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1993
Title
Western Area Power Administration-Issues for Discussion-Proposed SLCA/IP Firm Power Rate Adjustment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:012~Z ' <br /> <br />D-R - A - F - T <br /> <br />\. <br /> <br />P:\User\Thomas\95Rate\Iss $41M.Rat <br /> <br />May 12. 1993 <br /> <br />$41 Million Audit Adiustment <br /> <br />(alt Note: "0 Finance is wor~inq to qive us a brea~down of the contents of the <br />$41 million. so we will revise the Issue Paper and put in heavy-duty details when <br />we qet it.) <br /> <br />Issue <br /> <br />. The FY 1992 Western Annual Report indicated a 541 million inconsistency <br />between the CRSP PRS and Western's audited financial statements. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />. In FY 1987, Western began implementing a new automated Financial <br />.0 Management System (FMS). It took over three years to get the FMS <br />-Operational. During that time, the closing of the financial records each <br />year was incomplete and required numerous adjustments. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Regular crosswalks (documented reconciliation) between the F/S and PRS <br />were conducted during this period, and agreed-upon audit adjustments were <br />made in the PRS. However, because of the operating problems within FMS, <br />those same adjustments (or related adjustments) were not made in the F/S. <br />They were maintained in separate schedules by the auditors. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />. During the FY 1992 audit of the financial records, it was determined that <br />the adjustments should be recognized in the F/S. The adjustments were <br />shown in Western's Annual Report. These adjustments are being made to the <br />financial records during FY 1993. <br /> <br />Problem: <br /> <br />. The Annual Report shows revenues in FY 1992 of SI48 million, while <br />operations data show only SI07 million. The difference is due to <br />auditors' revisions. Estimated revenues recorded since FY 1986 have been <br />replaced with actual figures. These adjustments were not recorded in the <br />F/S until FY 1993. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This is a non-issue, as far as the rate process is concerned. It can be <br />ignored. A 11 of the adjustments were made in the PRS in the years in <br />which they originally occurred. They have no further rate impact beyond <br />that already seen, The financial records are merely being adjusted to <br />match the changes already made in the PRS. <br /> <br />, <br />\ <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.